Denseness results in the theory of algebraic fields (Q2033000): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Normalize DOI. |
||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.apal.2021.102973 / rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.APAL.2021.102973 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 20:07, 16 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Denseness results in the theory of algebraic fields |
scientific article |
Statements
Denseness results in the theory of algebraic fields (English)
0 references
14 June 2021
0 references
By an \textit{algebraic field} of characteristic 0, the authors mean an algebraic extension of \(\mathbb{Q}\). The main result of this paper is Theorem 1.1, which says that every model of the common theory of algebraic fields of characteristic \(0\) is dense in all its real closures and in all its \(p\)-adic closures. The authors point out that a stronger result holds for algebraic fields: they are dense in their henselization with respect to any valuation (not just with respect to \(p\)-valuations), and that this stronger result no longer holds for arbitrary models of the common theory of algebraic fields. The authors obtain an important consequence of Theorem 1.1, which is Corollary 1.2 saying that if \(\mathbb{Q}\subseteq F\) is an algebraic field extension such that \(\mathbb{Q}\) is properly contained in the algebraic part of \(\mathbb{R}\) or in some \(\mathbb{Q}_p\), then the ring of power series over \(F\) is definable by an existential formula in the field of Laurent series over \(F\). The authors also show that the ``properly contained'' assumption above is necessary.
0 references
model theory
0 references
valuation
0 references
Henselian
0 references
real closure
0 references
\(p\)-adic closure
0 references
algebraic fields
0 references