Probabilistic linguistic preference relation-based decision framework for multi-attribute group decision making (Q2333947): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q128727652, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1729550574494
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.3390/sym11010002 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.3390/SYM11010002 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 01:25, 18 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Probabilistic linguistic preference relation-based decision framework for multi-attribute group decision making
scientific article

    Statements

    Probabilistic linguistic preference relation-based decision framework for multi-attribute group decision making (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 November 2019
    0 references
    Summary: With trending competition in decision-making process, linguistic decision-making is gaining attractive attention. Previous studies on linguistic decision-making have neglected the occurring probability (relative importance) of each linguistic term which causes unreasonable ranking of objects. Further, decision-makers' (DMs) often face difficulties in providing apt preference information for evaluation. Motivated by these challenges, in this paper, we set our proposal on probabilistic linguistic preference relation (PLPR)-based decision framework. The framework consists of two phases viz., (a) \textit{missing value entry phase} and (b) \textit{ranking phase}. In phase (a), the missing values of PLPR are filled using a newly proposed automatic procedure and consistency of PLPR is ensured using a consistency check and repair mechanism. Following this, in phase (b), objects are ranked using newly proposed analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method under PLPR context. The practicality of the proposal is validated by using two numerical examples viz., green supplier selection problem for healthcare and the automobile industry. Finally, the strength and weakness of the proposal are discussed by comparing with similar methods.
    0 references
    analytic hierarchy process
    0 references
    consistency measure
    0 references
    group decision-making
    0 references
    probabilistic linguistic preference relation
    0 references

    Identifiers