Geometrisation of purely hyperbolic representations in \(\mathrm{PSL}_2\mathbb{R}\) (Q2664127): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1515/advgeom-2020-0025 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1515/ADVGEOM-2020-0025 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:46, 19 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Geometrisation of purely hyperbolic representations in \(\mathrm{PSL}_2\mathbb{R}\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Geometrisation of purely hyperbolic representations in \(\mathrm{PSL}_2\mathbb{R}\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    20 April 2021
    0 references
    The main result of the paper under review is the following theorem: Theorem. Let \(\rho:\pi_1S \rightarrow {PSL}_2\mathbb{R}\) be a non-Fuchsian, purely hyperbolic and non-elementary representation. Then \(\rho\) is geometrisable by a branched hyperbolic structure if and only if \(\rho(\pi_1S)\) is cocompact and the map \(f:S \rightarrow \Sigma=\mathbb{H}^2/\rho(\pi_1S)\) is not homotopic to a pinch map. Here, geometrisable means that the representation arises as the holonomy of a branched hyperbolic structure on \(S\) and purely hyperbolic means that its image consists only of hyperbolic elements along with the identity. And \(f:S \rightarrow \Sigma\) is called a pinch map if there are two simple closed non-contractible curves \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) meeting transversally at a single point such that \(f(\alpha)\) and \(f(\beta)\) are contractible in \(\Sigma\). The paper is very readable because it includes not only self-contained explanations but also helpful and motivating examples.
    0 references
    0 references
    surface
    0 references
    branched hyperbolic structure
    0 references
    holonomy
    0 references

    Identifiers