On the number of Tverberg partitions in the prime power case (Q854837): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.ejc.2005.06.005 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.EJC.2005.06.005 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 02:07, 28 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the number of Tverberg partitions in the prime power case
scientific article

    Statements

    On the number of Tverberg partitions in the prime power case (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    7 December 2006
    0 references
    \textit{H. Tverberg} showed in [J. Lond. Math. Soc. 41, 123--128 (1966; Zbl 0131.20002)] that any set of \((d+1)(q-1)+1\) points in \(\mathbb R^d\) admits a partition into \(q\) subsets such that the intersection of their convex hulls is nonempty. The result is the best possible; for fewer than this number of points the statemtne does not hold. Placed in a topological setting this becomes: If \(q\geq 2\), \(d\geq 1\), and \(N:=(d+1)(q-1)\), for every affine map \(f: \|\sigma^N\|\to \mathbb R^d\) there are \(q\) disjoint faces \(F_1,\dots,F_q\) of the standard \(N\)-simplex \(\sigma^N\) whose images under \(f\) intersect, \(\bigcap^q_{i=1}f(\|F_i\|)\neq \emptyset\). For \(q\) a prime and \(f\) a continuous map, this was proved by \textit{I. Bárány} et al. [J. Lond. Math. Soc. II. Ser. 23, 158--164 (1981; Zbl 0453.55003)]. The conjecture that there are at least \([(q-1)!]^d\) Tverberg partitions for any set of \((d+1)(q-1)+1\) points in \(\mathbb R^d\) is still unproved. For \(q\) a prime a non-trivial lower bound is known; here this result is extended to the prime power case.
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references