Augustus De Morgan's anonymous reviews for The Athenæum: a mirror of a Victorian mathematician (Q286031): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
The Athenæum was a British magazine published in London from 1828 to 1921. One of the most prolific contributors to the journal was the famous mathematician Augustus De Morgan, who was responsible for approximately 1000 book reviews published in the years 1840--1869. Although the reviews were printed anonymously, it is now possible to identify their authors from the extant records. The present paper focuses on selected De Morgan's book reviews, and clearly shows how their author often took the opportunity to express his personal opinions, or to promote his own areas of interest. For example, attention is paid to De Morgan's discoveries in the calculus priority dispute, as well as his critical attitude towards the examination system at British universities. De Morgan's reviews were sharp and witty; this is evident from the passages where he criticizes James Maurice Wilson's new geometry textbook, or when he deals with the attempts of James Smith to square the circle. In the final part of the paper, the authors categorize the books that De Morgan reviewed by their subject. Their classification confirms that De Morgan's interests were not limited to mathematics or science, but included also theology, philosophy, history etc. The article sheds a new light on the personality of Augustus De Morgan. It is very well written and might be of interest to all historians of mathematics.
Property / review text: The Athenæum was a British magazine published in London from 1828 to 1921. One of the most prolific contributors to the journal was the famous mathematician Augustus De Morgan, who was responsible for approximately 1000 book reviews published in the years 1840--1869. Although the reviews were printed anonymously, it is now possible to identify their authors from the extant records. The present paper focuses on selected De Morgan's book reviews, and clearly shows how their author often took the opportunity to express his personal opinions, or to promote his own areas of interest. For example, attention is paid to De Morgan's discoveries in the calculus priority dispute, as well as his critical attitude towards the examination system at British universities. De Morgan's reviews were sharp and witty; this is evident from the passages where he criticizes James Maurice Wilson's new geometry textbook, or when he deals with the attempts of James Smith to square the circle. In the final part of the paper, the authors categorize the books that De Morgan reviewed by their subject. Their classification confirms that De Morgan's interests were not limited to mathematics or science, but included also theology, philosophy, history etc. The article sheds a new light on the personality of Augustus De Morgan. It is very well written and might be of interest to all historians of mathematics. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Antonín Slavík / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 01A55 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 01A70 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 01A90 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6582886 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
De Morgan
Property / zbMATH Keywords: De Morgan / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Victorian
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Victorian / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Britain
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Britain / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
19th century
Property / zbMATH Keywords: 19th century / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
book reviews
Property / zbMATH Keywords: book reviews / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
public understanding of mathematics
Property / zbMATH Keywords: public understanding of mathematics / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 18:39, 27 June 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Augustus De Morgan's anonymous reviews for The Athenæum: a mirror of a Victorian mathematician
scientific article

    Statements

    Augustus De Morgan's anonymous reviews for The Athenæum: a mirror of a Victorian mathematician (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    19 May 2016
    0 references
    The Athenæum was a British magazine published in London from 1828 to 1921. One of the most prolific contributors to the journal was the famous mathematician Augustus De Morgan, who was responsible for approximately 1000 book reviews published in the years 1840--1869. Although the reviews were printed anonymously, it is now possible to identify their authors from the extant records. The present paper focuses on selected De Morgan's book reviews, and clearly shows how their author often took the opportunity to express his personal opinions, or to promote his own areas of interest. For example, attention is paid to De Morgan's discoveries in the calculus priority dispute, as well as his critical attitude towards the examination system at British universities. De Morgan's reviews were sharp and witty; this is evident from the passages where he criticizes James Maurice Wilson's new geometry textbook, or when he deals with the attempts of James Smith to square the circle. In the final part of the paper, the authors categorize the books that De Morgan reviewed by their subject. Their classification confirms that De Morgan's interests were not limited to mathematics or science, but included also theology, philosophy, history etc. The article sheds a new light on the personality of Augustus De Morgan. It is very well written and might be of interest to all historians of mathematics.
    0 references
    De Morgan
    0 references
    Victorian
    0 references
    Britain
    0 references
    19th century
    0 references
    book reviews
    0 references
    public understanding of mathematics
    0 references

    Identifiers