Proof internalization in generalized Frege systems for classical logic (Q392294): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
The paper offers a generalised approach to problems which are dealt with by the logic of proofs (or justification logic) invented by Artemov and being a generalization of modal provability logic. In particular, justification logic allows for dealing with propositions and proofs in the same language by means of so called proof polynomials which serve as templates for proofs. One can avoid in this way the problem of logical omniscience. The main problem in justification logics is with so called realization theorems which specify how to replace boxes in modal formulas with corresponding justifications. In the paper, the notion of generalised Frege system is introduced which allows for direct syntactical manipulation on proofs themselves, not their templates (proof polynomials). In this way we obtain systems that can internalize their own proofs. In Section 2, generalised Frege systems are described satisfying very general criteria (deduction and resolution property) and it is shown how to represent (translate) a logic in such a system. Internalization of proofs and nested structures are discussed first in an abstract way. Next, two concrete proof systems: Hilbert-style axiom system and some sequent calculus for classical logic are examined as examples of the application of the presented approach. Finally, the realization theorems for both example systems are proved and some generalizations are briefly discussed. The paper is of interest for students in proof theory and provability logic.
Property / review text: The paper offers a generalised approach to problems which are dealt with by the logic of proofs (or justification logic) invented by Artemov and being a generalization of modal provability logic. In particular, justification logic allows for dealing with propositions and proofs in the same language by means of so called proof polynomials which serve as templates for proofs. One can avoid in this way the problem of logical omniscience. The main problem in justification logics is with so called realization theorems which specify how to replace boxes in modal formulas with corresponding justifications. In the paper, the notion of generalised Frege system is introduced which allows for direct syntactical manipulation on proofs themselves, not their templates (proof polynomials). In this way we obtain systems that can internalize their own proofs. In Section 2, generalised Frege systems are described satisfying very general criteria (deduction and resolution property) and it is shown how to represent (translate) a logic in such a system. Internalization of proofs and nested structures are discussed first in an abstract way. Next, two concrete proof systems: Hilbert-style axiom system and some sequent calculus for classical logic are examined as examples of the application of the presented approach. Finally, the realization theorems for both example systems are proved and some generalizations are briefly discussed. The paper is of interest for students in proof theory and provability logic. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Andrzej Indrzejczak / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B45 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03F07 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03F45 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03F05 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6244776 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
provability logic
Property / zbMATH Keywords: provability logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
justification logic
Property / zbMATH Keywords: justification logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
modal logic
Property / zbMATH Keywords: modal logic / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 14:24, 29 June 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Proof internalization in generalized Frege systems for classical logic
scientific article

    Statements

    Proof internalization in generalized Frege systems for classical logic (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    13 January 2014
    0 references
    The paper offers a generalised approach to problems which are dealt with by the logic of proofs (or justification logic) invented by Artemov and being a generalization of modal provability logic. In particular, justification logic allows for dealing with propositions and proofs in the same language by means of so called proof polynomials which serve as templates for proofs. One can avoid in this way the problem of logical omniscience. The main problem in justification logics is with so called realization theorems which specify how to replace boxes in modal formulas with corresponding justifications. In the paper, the notion of generalised Frege system is introduced which allows for direct syntactical manipulation on proofs themselves, not their templates (proof polynomials). In this way we obtain systems that can internalize their own proofs. In Section 2, generalised Frege systems are described satisfying very general criteria (deduction and resolution property) and it is shown how to represent (translate) a logic in such a system. Internalization of proofs and nested structures are discussed first in an abstract way. Next, two concrete proof systems: Hilbert-style axiom system and some sequent calculus for classical logic are examined as examples of the application of the presented approach. Finally, the realization theorems for both example systems are proved and some generalizations are briefly discussed. The paper is of interest for students in proof theory and provability logic.
    0 references
    provability logic
    0 references
    justification logic
    0 references
    modal logic
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references