How fast do polynomials grow on semialgebraic sets? (Q403810): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / review text | |||
For a subset \(S\) of \(\mathbb{R}^n\), denote by \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) the set of all polynomials in \(\mathbb{R}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]\) whose square is bounded on \(S\) by a polynomial of degree at most \(2d\). Each set \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) is a module over \({\mathcal B}_0(S)\) and their direct sum \(\mathcal{B}(S)\) is a graded algebra. In this article, the authors systematically construct examples and counterexamples to the following statements: (1) \({\mathcal B}(S)\) is finitely generated. (2) \({\mathcal B}_0(S)\) is finitely generated. (3) Every \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) is a finitely generated \({\mathcal B}_0(S)\) module. (4) \({\mathcal B}_0(S) = \mathbb{R}\) implies that every \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) is a finite dimensional vector space. The ``interesting'' examples and counterexamples pertain to semialgebraic sets without low-dimensional components and with isolated points at infinity. Above statements are logically related to the ``moment problem'': Given a functional \(\varphi: \mathbb{R}[x_1,\ldots,x_n] \to \mathbb{R}\), is there a measure \(\mu\) such that \(\varphi(p) = \int p\; d\mu\) for all polynomials \(p \in \mathbb{R}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]\)? In some cases, this problem can be decided by criteria of \textit{E. K. Haviland} [Am. J. Math. 58, 164--168 (1936; Zbl 0015.10901)] and \textit{K. Schmüdgen} [Math. Ann. 289, No. 2, 203--206 (1991; Zbl 0744.44008), J. Reine Angew. Math. 558, 225--234 (2003; Zbl 1047.47012)]. On the other hand, it follows from [\textit{C. Scheiderer,} J. Complexity 21, No. 6, 823--844 (2005; Zbl 1093.13024)] that in case of \({\mathcal B}_0(S) = \mathbb{R}\) and validity of (4) the moment problem cannot be decided by these criteria. The main insight of this article is that there are sets that are neither amenable to Schmüdgen's nor to Scheiderer's criteria. In other words: Existing methods are insufficient to decide the moment problem for sets constructed in this paper. | |||
Property / review text: For a subset \(S\) of \(\mathbb{R}^n\), denote by \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) the set of all polynomials in \(\mathbb{R}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]\) whose square is bounded on \(S\) by a polynomial of degree at most \(2d\). Each set \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) is a module over \({\mathcal B}_0(S)\) and their direct sum \(\mathcal{B}(S)\) is a graded algebra. In this article, the authors systematically construct examples and counterexamples to the following statements: (1) \({\mathcal B}(S)\) is finitely generated. (2) \({\mathcal B}_0(S)\) is finitely generated. (3) Every \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) is a finitely generated \({\mathcal B}_0(S)\) module. (4) \({\mathcal B}_0(S) = \mathbb{R}\) implies that every \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) is a finite dimensional vector space. The ``interesting'' examples and counterexamples pertain to semialgebraic sets without low-dimensional components and with isolated points at infinity. Above statements are logically related to the ``moment problem'': Given a functional \(\varphi: \mathbb{R}[x_1,\ldots,x_n] \to \mathbb{R}\), is there a measure \(\mu\) such that \(\varphi(p) = \int p\; d\mu\) for all polynomials \(p \in \mathbb{R}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]\)? In some cases, this problem can be decided by criteria of \textit{E. K. Haviland} [Am. J. Math. 58, 164--168 (1936; Zbl 0015.10901)] and \textit{K. Schmüdgen} [Math. Ann. 289, No. 2, 203--206 (1991; Zbl 0744.44008), J. Reine Angew. Math. 558, 225--234 (2003; Zbl 1047.47012)]. On the other hand, it follows from [\textit{C. Scheiderer,} J. Complexity 21, No. 6, 823--844 (2005; Zbl 1093.13024)] that in case of \({\mathcal B}_0(S) = \mathbb{R}\) and validity of (4) the moment problem cannot be decided by these criteria. The main insight of this article is that there are sets that are neither amenable to Schmüdgen's nor to Scheiderer's criteria. In other words: Existing methods are insufficient to decide the moment problem for sets constructed in this paper. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Hans-Peter Schröcker / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 14P10 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 16W50 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 44A60 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 14M25 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 14M27 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6336192 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
semialgebraic set | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: semialgebraic set / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
compactification | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: compactification / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
graded algebra | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: graded algebra / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
moment problem | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: moment problem / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 16:59, 29 June 2023
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | How fast do polynomials grow on semialgebraic sets? |
scientific article |
Statements
How fast do polynomials grow on semialgebraic sets? (English)
0 references
29 August 2014
0 references
For a subset \(S\) of \(\mathbb{R}^n\), denote by \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) the set of all polynomials in \(\mathbb{R}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]\) whose square is bounded on \(S\) by a polynomial of degree at most \(2d\). Each set \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) is a module over \({\mathcal B}_0(S)\) and their direct sum \(\mathcal{B}(S)\) is a graded algebra. In this article, the authors systematically construct examples and counterexamples to the following statements: (1) \({\mathcal B}(S)\) is finitely generated. (2) \({\mathcal B}_0(S)\) is finitely generated. (3) Every \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) is a finitely generated \({\mathcal B}_0(S)\) module. (4) \({\mathcal B}_0(S) = \mathbb{R}\) implies that every \({\mathcal B}_d(S)\) is a finite dimensional vector space. The ``interesting'' examples and counterexamples pertain to semialgebraic sets without low-dimensional components and with isolated points at infinity. Above statements are logically related to the ``moment problem'': Given a functional \(\varphi: \mathbb{R}[x_1,\ldots,x_n] \to \mathbb{R}\), is there a measure \(\mu\) such that \(\varphi(p) = \int p\; d\mu\) for all polynomials \(p \in \mathbb{R}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]\)? In some cases, this problem can be decided by criteria of \textit{E. K. Haviland} [Am. J. Math. 58, 164--168 (1936; Zbl 0015.10901)] and \textit{K. Schmüdgen} [Math. Ann. 289, No. 2, 203--206 (1991; Zbl 0744.44008), J. Reine Angew. Math. 558, 225--234 (2003; Zbl 1047.47012)]. On the other hand, it follows from [\textit{C. Scheiderer,} J. Complexity 21, No. 6, 823--844 (2005; Zbl 1093.13024)] that in case of \({\mathcal B}_0(S) = \mathbb{R}\) and validity of (4) the moment problem cannot be decided by these criteria. The main insight of this article is that there are sets that are neither amenable to Schmüdgen's nor to Scheiderer's criteria. In other words: Existing methods are insufficient to decide the moment problem for sets constructed in this paper.
0 references
semialgebraic set
0 references
compactification
0 references
graded algebra
0 references
moment problem
0 references