Hardness of discrepancy computation and \(\varepsilon\)-net verification in high dimension (Q413466): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
The star discrepancy (or geometric discrepancy with respect to corners) of a set \(P\) of \(n\) points in the \(d\)-dimensional unit cube \([0,1]^d\) is the supremum, taken over all axis-parallel rectangles \(R = [0,x] \subseteq [0,1]^d\) (``corners''), absolute deviation of the number of points in \(R\) from the expected value \(n \lambda(R)\), where \(\lambda\) denotes the \(d\)-dimensional Lebesgue measure. It is well known that the star discrepancy of an \(n\)-point set can be computed in time \(n^{O(d)}\). Also, the decision problem if the star discrepancy exceeds a given value, is NP-hard if \(d\) is part of the input. This work presents a stronger lower bound by showing that the decision problem is even W[1]-hard with respect to \(d\). Consequently, algorithms with runtime bounded by \(f(d) n^{O(1)}\) do not exist unless FPT = W[1]. Analogous results are shown for the decision versions of a number of related problems: Computing the largest empty corner, the largest empty axis parallel rectangle, the red-blue discrepancy with respect to axis-parallel rectangles and several others. The first of these is even hard even to approximate within a factor of \(2^n\). Also, the problem of deciding whether a subset \(S\) of \(P\) is an \(\varepsilon\)-net with respect to half-spaces, is co-NP-hard and co-W[1]-hard.
Property / review text: The star discrepancy (or geometric discrepancy with respect to corners) of a set \(P\) of \(n\) points in the \(d\)-dimensional unit cube \([0,1]^d\) is the supremum, taken over all axis-parallel rectangles \(R = [0,x] \subseteq [0,1]^d\) (``corners''), absolute deviation of the number of points in \(R\) from the expected value \(n \lambda(R)\), where \(\lambda\) denotes the \(d\)-dimensional Lebesgue measure. It is well known that the star discrepancy of an \(n\)-point set can be computed in time \(n^{O(d)}\). Also, the decision problem if the star discrepancy exceeds a given value, is NP-hard if \(d\) is part of the input. This work presents a stronger lower bound by showing that the decision problem is even W[1]-hard with respect to \(d\). Consequently, algorithms with runtime bounded by \(f(d) n^{O(1)}\) do not exist unless FPT = W[1]. Analogous results are shown for the decision versions of a number of related problems: Computing the largest empty corner, the largest empty axis parallel rectangle, the red-blue discrepancy with respect to axis-parallel rectangles and several others. The first of these is even hard even to approximate within a factor of \(2^n\). Also, the problem of deciding whether a subset \(S\) of \(P\) is an \(\varepsilon\)-net with respect to half-spaces, is co-NP-hard and co-W[1]-hard. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Benjamin Doerr / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 11K38 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65Y20 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6031124 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
discrepancy
Property / zbMATH Keywords: discrepancy / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
epsilon-nets
Property / zbMATH Keywords: epsilon-nets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
geometric dimension
Property / zbMATH Keywords: geometric dimension / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
parameterized complexity
Property / zbMATH Keywords: parameterized complexity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
inapproximability
Property / zbMATH Keywords: inapproximability / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 19:05, 29 June 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Hardness of discrepancy computation and \(\varepsilon\)-net verification in high dimension
scientific article

    Statements

    Hardness of discrepancy computation and \(\varepsilon\)-net verification in high dimension (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    7 May 2012
    0 references
    The star discrepancy (or geometric discrepancy with respect to corners) of a set \(P\) of \(n\) points in the \(d\)-dimensional unit cube \([0,1]^d\) is the supremum, taken over all axis-parallel rectangles \(R = [0,x] \subseteq [0,1]^d\) (``corners''), absolute deviation of the number of points in \(R\) from the expected value \(n \lambda(R)\), where \(\lambda\) denotes the \(d\)-dimensional Lebesgue measure. It is well known that the star discrepancy of an \(n\)-point set can be computed in time \(n^{O(d)}\). Also, the decision problem if the star discrepancy exceeds a given value, is NP-hard if \(d\) is part of the input. This work presents a stronger lower bound by showing that the decision problem is even W[1]-hard with respect to \(d\). Consequently, algorithms with runtime bounded by \(f(d) n^{O(1)}\) do not exist unless FPT = W[1]. Analogous results are shown for the decision versions of a number of related problems: Computing the largest empty corner, the largest empty axis parallel rectangle, the red-blue discrepancy with respect to axis-parallel rectangles and several others. The first of these is even hard even to approximate within a factor of \(2^n\). Also, the problem of deciding whether a subset \(S\) of \(P\) is an \(\varepsilon\)-net with respect to half-spaces, is co-NP-hard and co-W[1]-hard.
    0 references
    discrepancy
    0 references
    epsilon-nets
    0 references
    geometric dimension
    0 references
    parameterized complexity
    0 references
    inapproximability
    0 references

    Identifiers