Bifurcation of a heterodimensional cycle with weak inclination flip (Q414754): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
The spirit of the present paper is very similar to the one by \textit{D. Liu} et al. [Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Ser. S 4, No. 6, 1511--1532 (2011; Zbl 1257.34026)]. As there, the authors study in \(\mathbb{R}^4\) bifurcations from a heteroclinic cycle connecting two hyperbolic equilibria \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) with different saddle indices (dimension of the unstable manifold). Again it is assumed that all eigenvalues of the linearizations at the equilibria are real and simple; \(p_1\) has saddle index 3 and \(p_2\) has saddle index 2. And again it is assumed that the (nonrobust) heteroclinic orbit connecting \(p_2\) to \(p_1\) undergoes an inclination flip at \(p_1\). But here, in difference to the above mentioned paper, a so-called weak inclination flip is assumed. The authors restrict their considerations to single around dynamics, i.e., heteroclinic cycles, 1-homoclinic and 1-periodic orbits. The type of results as well as strategy of the proofs resembles pretty much those in [loc. cit.].
Property / review text: The spirit of the present paper is very similar to the one by \textit{D. Liu} et al. [Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Ser. S 4, No. 6, 1511--1532 (2011; Zbl 1257.34026)]. As there, the authors study in \(\mathbb{R}^4\) bifurcations from a heteroclinic cycle connecting two hyperbolic equilibria \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) with different saddle indices (dimension of the unstable manifold). Again it is assumed that all eigenvalues of the linearizations at the equilibria are real and simple; \(p_1\) has saddle index 3 and \(p_2\) has saddle index 2. And again it is assumed that the (nonrobust) heteroclinic orbit connecting \(p_2\) to \(p_1\) undergoes an inclination flip at \(p_1\). But here, in difference to the above mentioned paper, a so-called weak inclination flip is assumed. The authors restrict their considerations to single around dynamics, i.e., heteroclinic cycles, 1-homoclinic and 1-periodic orbits. The type of results as well as strategy of the proofs resembles pretty much those in [loc. cit.]. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Jürgen Knobloch / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 34C23 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 34C37 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 37G25 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 34C05 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6033387 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
bifurcation
Property / zbMATH Keywords: bifurcation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
heterodimensional cycle
Property / zbMATH Keywords: heterodimensional cycle / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
weak inclination flip
Property / zbMATH Keywords: weak inclination flip / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
heteroclinic orbits
Property / zbMATH Keywords: heteroclinic orbits / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
homoclinic orbits
Property / zbMATH Keywords: homoclinic orbits / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
periodic orbit
Property / zbMATH Keywords: periodic orbit / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 19:22, 29 June 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Bifurcation of a heterodimensional cycle with weak inclination flip
scientific article

    Statements

    Bifurcation of a heterodimensional cycle with weak inclination flip (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    11 May 2012
    0 references
    The spirit of the present paper is very similar to the one by \textit{D. Liu} et al. [Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Ser. S 4, No. 6, 1511--1532 (2011; Zbl 1257.34026)]. As there, the authors study in \(\mathbb{R}^4\) bifurcations from a heteroclinic cycle connecting two hyperbolic equilibria \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) with different saddle indices (dimension of the unstable manifold). Again it is assumed that all eigenvalues of the linearizations at the equilibria are real and simple; \(p_1\) has saddle index 3 and \(p_2\) has saddle index 2. And again it is assumed that the (nonrobust) heteroclinic orbit connecting \(p_2\) to \(p_1\) undergoes an inclination flip at \(p_1\). But here, in difference to the above mentioned paper, a so-called weak inclination flip is assumed. The authors restrict their considerations to single around dynamics, i.e., heteroclinic cycles, 1-homoclinic and 1-periodic orbits. The type of results as well as strategy of the proofs resembles pretty much those in [loc. cit.].
    0 references
    bifurcation
    0 references
    heterodimensional cycle
    0 references
    weak inclination flip
    0 references
    heteroclinic orbits
    0 references
    homoclinic orbits
    0 references
    periodic orbit
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references