On oscillation of differential and difference equations with non-monotone delays (Q426440): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Elena Braverman / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / review text
 
The authors study the delay differential equation \[ x'(t)+ p(t) x(h(t))= 0,\qquad t\geq 0,\tag{1} \] with \[ \begin{gathered} (\forall t\geq 0)((p(t)\geq 0)\wedge (h(t)\leq t)),\\ \lim_{t\to+\infty} h(t)=+\infty,\qquad \liminf_{t\to+\infty}\, \int^t_{h(t)} p(u)\,du> e^{-1},\end{gathered} \] and the difference equation \[ \Delta x(n)+ p(n) x(h(n))= 0,\qquad n\geq 0,\tag{2} \] \[ \begin{gathered} (\forall n\geq 0)((\Delta x(n)= x(n+1)- x(n))\wedge (p(n)\geq 0)\wedge (h(n)\leq n)),\\ \lim_{n\to+\infty}h(n)= +\infty.\end{gathered} \] The inequalities \[ \limsup_{t\to+\infty}\, \int^t_{h(t)} p(u)\,du> 1,\qquad\limsup_{n\to+\infty}\, \sum^n_{j= h(n)} p(j)> 1 \] do not imply oscillations of (1) and (2). The authors prove that there are not constants \(A\) and \(B\) such that \[ \limsup_{t\to+\infty}\, \int^t_{h(t)} p(u)\,du> A,\qquad \limsup_{n\to+\infty}\, \sum^n_{j= h(n)} p(j)> B \] imply oscillation of (1) and (2). The authors present new sufficient oscillation conditions.
Property / review text: The authors study the delay differential equation \[ x'(t)+ p(t) x(h(t))= 0,\qquad t\geq 0,\tag{1} \] with \[ \begin{gathered} (\forall t\geq 0)((p(t)\geq 0)\wedge (h(t)\leq t)),\\ \lim_{t\to+\infty} h(t)=+\infty,\qquad \liminf_{t\to+\infty}\, \int^t_{h(t)} p(u)\,du> e^{-1},\end{gathered} \] and the difference equation \[ \Delta x(n)+ p(n) x(h(n))= 0,\qquad n\geq 0,\tag{2} \] \[ \begin{gathered} (\forall n\geq 0)((\Delta x(n)= x(n+1)- x(n))\wedge (p(n)\geq 0)\wedge (h(n)\leq n)),\\ \lim_{n\to+\infty}h(n)= +\infty.\end{gathered} \] The inequalities \[ \limsup_{t\to+\infty}\, \int^t_{h(t)} p(u)\,du> 1,\qquad\limsup_{n\to+\infty}\, \sum^n_{j= h(n)} p(j)> 1 \] do not imply oscillations of (1) and (2). The authors prove that there are not constants \(A\) and \(B\) such that \[ \limsup_{t\to+\infty}\, \int^t_{h(t)} p(u)\,du> A,\qquad \limsup_{n\to+\infty}\, \sum^n_{j= h(n)} p(j)> B \] imply oscillation of (1) and (2). The authors present new sufficient oscillation conditions. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Dan-Mircea Borş / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 39A21 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 39A10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 39A12 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 34K11 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6045210 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
oscillation
Property / zbMATH Keywords: oscillation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
nonoscillation
Property / zbMATH Keywords: nonoscillation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
delay differential equations
Property / zbMATH Keywords: delay differential equations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
delay difference equations
Property / zbMATH Keywords: delay difference equations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
sufficient oscillation conditions
Property / zbMATH Keywords: sufficient oscillation conditions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
maximal argument
Property / zbMATH Keywords: maximal argument / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 21:52, 29 June 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On oscillation of differential and difference equations with non-monotone delays
scientific article

    Statements

    On oscillation of differential and difference equations with non-monotone delays (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    11 June 2012
    0 references
    The authors study the delay differential equation \[ x'(t)+ p(t) x(h(t))= 0,\qquad t\geq 0,\tag{1} \] with \[ \begin{gathered} (\forall t\geq 0)((p(t)\geq 0)\wedge (h(t)\leq t)),\\ \lim_{t\to+\infty} h(t)=+\infty,\qquad \liminf_{t\to+\infty}\, \int^t_{h(t)} p(u)\,du> e^{-1},\end{gathered} \] and the difference equation \[ \Delta x(n)+ p(n) x(h(n))= 0,\qquad n\geq 0,\tag{2} \] \[ \begin{gathered} (\forall n\geq 0)((\Delta x(n)= x(n+1)- x(n))\wedge (p(n)\geq 0)\wedge (h(n)\leq n)),\\ \lim_{n\to+\infty}h(n)= +\infty.\end{gathered} \] The inequalities \[ \limsup_{t\to+\infty}\, \int^t_{h(t)} p(u)\,du> 1,\qquad\limsup_{n\to+\infty}\, \sum^n_{j= h(n)} p(j)> 1 \] do not imply oscillations of (1) and (2). The authors prove that there are not constants \(A\) and \(B\) such that \[ \limsup_{t\to+\infty}\, \int^t_{h(t)} p(u)\,du> A,\qquad \limsup_{n\to+\infty}\, \sum^n_{j= h(n)} p(j)> B \] imply oscillation of (1) and (2). The authors present new sufficient oscillation conditions.
    0 references
    oscillation
    0 references
    nonoscillation
    0 references
    delay differential equations
    0 references
    delay difference equations
    0 references
    sufficient oscillation conditions
    0 references
    maximal argument
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references