Inequality aversion and risk aversion (Q435922): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
A social welfare function can be defined as a function of individual preferences. A comparative notion of inequality aversion for certainty equivalents is easily defined. The analysis is made slightly simpler by supposing that the social welfare function operates on utilities directly; that is, it is a Bergson-Samuelson social welfare function with respect to the certainty equivalents. In this paper the author proves that for two social welfare functions which are inequality averse with respect to certainty equivalents, if one is more inequality averse for certainty equivalents than the other, the household preference induced by optimally allocating aggregate bundles according to this social welfare function is more risk averse than the other. It is also shown that the comparative static can be reversed if absolute inequality aversion is dropped and the utilitarian rule always induces the least risk averse household preference among all social welfare functions.
Property / review text: A social welfare function can be defined as a function of individual preferences. A comparative notion of inequality aversion for certainty equivalents is easily defined. The analysis is made slightly simpler by supposing that the social welfare function operates on utilities directly; that is, it is a Bergson-Samuelson social welfare function with respect to the certainty equivalents. In this paper the author proves that for two social welfare functions which are inequality averse with respect to certainty equivalents, if one is more inequality averse for certainty equivalents than the other, the household preference induced by optimally allocating aggregate bundles according to this social welfare function is more risk averse than the other. It is also shown that the comparative static can be reversed if absolute inequality aversion is dropped and the utilitarian rule always induces the least risk averse household preference among all social welfare functions. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: C. L. Parihar / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91B08 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91B15 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91B30 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6055208 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
risk aversion
Property / zbMATH Keywords: risk aversion / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
inequality aversion
Property / zbMATH Keywords: inequality aversion / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
aggregation
Property / zbMATH Keywords: aggregation / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 00:57, 30 June 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Inequality aversion and risk aversion
scientific article

    Statements

    Inequality aversion and risk aversion (English)
    0 references
    13 July 2012
    0 references
    A social welfare function can be defined as a function of individual preferences. A comparative notion of inequality aversion for certainty equivalents is easily defined. The analysis is made slightly simpler by supposing that the social welfare function operates on utilities directly; that is, it is a Bergson-Samuelson social welfare function with respect to the certainty equivalents. In this paper the author proves that for two social welfare functions which are inequality averse with respect to certainty equivalents, if one is more inequality averse for certainty equivalents than the other, the household preference induced by optimally allocating aggregate bundles according to this social welfare function is more risk averse than the other. It is also shown that the comparative static can be reversed if absolute inequality aversion is dropped and the utilitarian rule always induces the least risk averse household preference among all social welfare functions.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    risk aversion
    0 references
    inequality aversion
    0 references
    aggregation
    0 references