Notes on vertex atlas of Danzer tiling (Q449630): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
The authors investigate a planar tiling, due to \textit{K.-P. Nischke} and \textit{L. Danzer} [Discrete Comput. Geom. 15, No. 2, 221--236 (1996; Zbl 0849.52016)], which is defined by a primitive non-Pisot inflation rule with 3 triangular prototiles. The hull (or LI class) of the tiling has sevenfold symmetry as a set, but no element of the hull shows individual sevenfold symmetry. This well-known fact is proved in this paper and compared with the (different) situation of the rhombic Penrose tiling. Contrary to the claim of the authors, the lack of individual symmetry is not exotic, but quite common (it also occurs for the Tuebingen triangle tiling, see [\textit{M. Baake} et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 4, No. 15--16, 2217--2268 (1990; Zbl 0743.51015)] or [\textit{M. Baake} et al., J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 30, No. 9, 3029--3056 (1997; Zbl 0919.52015)]. Another aspect of the paper concerns the usability of the vertex atlas as a set of aperiodic local rules, which substantiates a statement in the original paper by Nischke and Danzer. As expected (and intended), the vertex atlas serves for the inflation tiling hull, and not for its symmetry-extended version, which is non-minimal as a dynamical system under the translation action (and thus a less natural object to consider). The additional claims about the rhombic Penrose tilings have appeared in numerous articles, sometimes with greater precision. For instance, there are 4 Penrose tilings with fivefold symmetry, not 2 as claimed in Figure 11, since the reflections in the horizontal axis are also elements of the hull. These 4 tilings form a 4-cycle under inflation [Baake et al., 1997, loc. cit.]. The reader should be aware that the mathematical developments since 1990 are not sufficiently reflected by the references (compare [\textit{E. A. Robinson} jun., Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 348, No. 11, 4447--4464 (1996; Zbl 0876.28020)] for the connections to dynamical systems and [Baake et al., 1997, loc. cit.] for the symmetry analysis).
Property / review text: The authors investigate a planar tiling, due to \textit{K.-P. Nischke} and \textit{L. Danzer} [Discrete Comput. Geom. 15, No. 2, 221--236 (1996; Zbl 0849.52016)], which is defined by a primitive non-Pisot inflation rule with 3 triangular prototiles. The hull (or LI class) of the tiling has sevenfold symmetry as a set, but no element of the hull shows individual sevenfold symmetry. This well-known fact is proved in this paper and compared with the (different) situation of the rhombic Penrose tiling. Contrary to the claim of the authors, the lack of individual symmetry is not exotic, but quite common (it also occurs for the Tuebingen triangle tiling, see [\textit{M. Baake} et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 4, No. 15--16, 2217--2268 (1990; Zbl 0743.51015)] or [\textit{M. Baake} et al., J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 30, No. 9, 3029--3056 (1997; Zbl 0919.52015)]. Another aspect of the paper concerns the usability of the vertex atlas as a set of aperiodic local rules, which substantiates a statement in the original paper by Nischke and Danzer. As expected (and intended), the vertex atlas serves for the inflation tiling hull, and not for its symmetry-extended version, which is non-minimal as a dynamical system under the translation action (and thus a less natural object to consider). The additional claims about the rhombic Penrose tilings have appeared in numerous articles, sometimes with greater precision. For instance, there are 4 Penrose tilings with fivefold symmetry, not 2 as claimed in Figure 11, since the reflections in the horizontal axis are also elements of the hull. These 4 tilings form a 4-cycle under inflation [Baake et al., 1997, loc. cit.]. The reader should be aware that the mathematical developments since 1990 are not sufficiently reflected by the references (compare [\textit{E. A. Robinson} jun., Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 348, No. 11, 4447--4464 (1996; Zbl 0876.28020)] for the connections to dynamical systems and [Baake et al., 1997, loc. cit.] for the symmetry analysis). / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Michael Baake / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 52C20 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 05B45 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 52C23 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6074848 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
substitution tiling
Property / zbMATH Keywords: substitution tiling / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
vertex atlas
Property / zbMATH Keywords: vertex atlas / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
local rules
Property / zbMATH Keywords: local rules / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
symmetry
Property / zbMATH Keywords: symmetry / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
rhombic Penrose tilings
Property / zbMATH Keywords: rhombic Penrose tilings / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 09:59, 30 June 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Notes on vertex atlas of Danzer tiling
scientific article

    Statements

    Notes on vertex atlas of Danzer tiling (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    31 August 2012
    0 references
    The authors investigate a planar tiling, due to \textit{K.-P. Nischke} and \textit{L. Danzer} [Discrete Comput. Geom. 15, No. 2, 221--236 (1996; Zbl 0849.52016)], which is defined by a primitive non-Pisot inflation rule with 3 triangular prototiles. The hull (or LI class) of the tiling has sevenfold symmetry as a set, but no element of the hull shows individual sevenfold symmetry. This well-known fact is proved in this paper and compared with the (different) situation of the rhombic Penrose tiling. Contrary to the claim of the authors, the lack of individual symmetry is not exotic, but quite common (it also occurs for the Tuebingen triangle tiling, see [\textit{M. Baake} et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 4, No. 15--16, 2217--2268 (1990; Zbl 0743.51015)] or [\textit{M. Baake} et al., J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 30, No. 9, 3029--3056 (1997; Zbl 0919.52015)]. Another aspect of the paper concerns the usability of the vertex atlas as a set of aperiodic local rules, which substantiates a statement in the original paper by Nischke and Danzer. As expected (and intended), the vertex atlas serves for the inflation tiling hull, and not for its symmetry-extended version, which is non-minimal as a dynamical system under the translation action (and thus a less natural object to consider). The additional claims about the rhombic Penrose tilings have appeared in numerous articles, sometimes with greater precision. For instance, there are 4 Penrose tilings with fivefold symmetry, not 2 as claimed in Figure 11, since the reflections in the horizontal axis are also elements of the hull. These 4 tilings form a 4-cycle under inflation [Baake et al., 1997, loc. cit.]. The reader should be aware that the mathematical developments since 1990 are not sufficiently reflected by the references (compare [\textit{E. A. Robinson} jun., Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 348, No. 11, 4447--4464 (1996; Zbl 0876.28020)] for the connections to dynamical systems and [Baake et al., 1997, loc. cit.] for the symmetry analysis).
    0 references
    0 references
    substitution tiling
    0 references
    vertex atlas
    0 references
    local rules
    0 references
    symmetry
    0 references
    rhombic Penrose tilings
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references