On the Błocki-Zwonek conjectures and beyond (Q500860): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
Let \(\Omega \subset \mathbb C^n\) be a bounded pseudoconvex domain and \(g_{\Omega} (\cdot, a)\) its pluricomplex Green function with a pole at a point \(a \in \Omega\). The following two conjectures are due to Z. Błocki and W. Zwonek: {\parindent=8mm \begin{itemize} \item[(C1)] The function \(\alpha (t):= e^{-2nt}\lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is nondecreasing on \((-\infty,0)\) \item [(C2)] The function \(\beta (t):= \log ( \lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is convex on \((-\infty,0)\). \end{itemize}} Here, \(\lambda_n\) denotes the Lebesgue measure. J. E. Fornæss has disproved (C2) by means of a triply connected domain in the plane, so the above conjectures will not hold in general. But the authors prove them under the hypothesis that \(\Omega \) is balanced. After this they consider the analogues of the functions \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) for the Green function with two poles in the case that \(\Omega\) is a planar domain. They disprove (C1) and (C2) in this case.
Property / review text: Let \(\Omega \subset \mathbb C^n\) be a bounded pseudoconvex domain and \(g_{\Omega} (\cdot, a)\) its pluricomplex Green function with a pole at a point \(a \in \Omega\). The following two conjectures are due to Z. Błocki and W. Zwonek: {\parindent=8mm \begin{itemize} \item[(C1)] The function \(\alpha (t):= e^{-2nt}\lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is nondecreasing on \((-\infty,0)\) \item [(C2)] The function \(\beta (t):= \log ( \lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is convex on \((-\infty,0)\). \end{itemize}} Here, \(\lambda_n\) denotes the Lebesgue measure. J. E. Fornæss has disproved (C2) by means of a triply connected domain in the plane, so the above conjectures will not hold in general. But the authors prove them under the hypothesis that \(\Omega \) is balanced. After this they consider the analogues of the functions \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) for the Green function with two poles in the case that \(\Omega\) is a planar domain. They disprove (C1) and (C2) in this case. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Gregor Herbort / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 32U35 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 32A25 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6489702 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
pluricomplex Green function
Property / zbMATH Keywords: pluricomplex Green function / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Bergman kernel
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Bergman kernel / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Błocki-Zwonek conjectures
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Błocki-Zwonek conjectures / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 00:16, 1 July 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the Błocki-Zwonek conjectures and beyond
scientific article

    Statements

    On the Błocki-Zwonek conjectures and beyond (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 October 2015
    0 references
    Let \(\Omega \subset \mathbb C^n\) be a bounded pseudoconvex domain and \(g_{\Omega} (\cdot, a)\) its pluricomplex Green function with a pole at a point \(a \in \Omega\). The following two conjectures are due to Z. Błocki and W. Zwonek: {\parindent=8mm \begin{itemize} \item[(C1)] The function \(\alpha (t):= e^{-2nt}\lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is nondecreasing on \((-\infty,0)\) \item [(C2)] The function \(\beta (t):= \log ( \lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is convex on \((-\infty,0)\). \end{itemize}} Here, \(\lambda_n\) denotes the Lebesgue measure. J. E. Fornæss has disproved (C2) by means of a triply connected domain in the plane, so the above conjectures will not hold in general. But the authors prove them under the hypothesis that \(\Omega \) is balanced. After this they consider the analogues of the functions \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) for the Green function with two poles in the case that \(\Omega\) is a planar domain. They disprove (C1) and (C2) in this case.
    0 references
    pluricomplex Green function
    0 references
    Bergman kernel
    0 references
    Błocki-Zwonek conjectures
    0 references

    Identifiers