On the Błocki-Zwonek conjectures and beyond (Q500860): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / review text | |||
Let \(\Omega \subset \mathbb C^n\) be a bounded pseudoconvex domain and \(g_{\Omega} (\cdot, a)\) its pluricomplex Green function with a pole at a point \(a \in \Omega\). The following two conjectures are due to Z. Błocki and W. Zwonek: {\parindent=8mm \begin{itemize} \item[(C1)] The function \(\alpha (t):= e^{-2nt}\lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is nondecreasing on \((-\infty,0)\) \item [(C2)] The function \(\beta (t):= \log ( \lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is convex on \((-\infty,0)\). \end{itemize}} Here, \(\lambda_n\) denotes the Lebesgue measure. J. E. Fornæss has disproved (C2) by means of a triply connected domain in the plane, so the above conjectures will not hold in general. But the authors prove them under the hypothesis that \(\Omega \) is balanced. After this they consider the analogues of the functions \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) for the Green function with two poles in the case that \(\Omega\) is a planar domain. They disprove (C1) and (C2) in this case. | |||
Property / review text: Let \(\Omega \subset \mathbb C^n\) be a bounded pseudoconvex domain and \(g_{\Omega} (\cdot, a)\) its pluricomplex Green function with a pole at a point \(a \in \Omega\). The following two conjectures are due to Z. Błocki and W. Zwonek: {\parindent=8mm \begin{itemize} \item[(C1)] The function \(\alpha (t):= e^{-2nt}\lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is nondecreasing on \((-\infty,0)\) \item [(C2)] The function \(\beta (t):= \log ( \lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is convex on \((-\infty,0)\). \end{itemize}} Here, \(\lambda_n\) denotes the Lebesgue measure. J. E. Fornæss has disproved (C2) by means of a triply connected domain in the plane, so the above conjectures will not hold in general. But the authors prove them under the hypothesis that \(\Omega \) is balanced. After this they consider the analogues of the functions \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) for the Green function with two poles in the case that \(\Omega\) is a planar domain. They disprove (C1) and (C2) in this case. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Gregor Herbort / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 32U35 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 32A25 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6489702 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
pluricomplex Green function | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: pluricomplex Green function / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Bergman kernel | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Bergman kernel / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Błocki-Zwonek conjectures | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Błocki-Zwonek conjectures / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 00:16, 1 July 2023
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On the Błocki-Zwonek conjectures and beyond |
scientific article |
Statements
On the Błocki-Zwonek conjectures and beyond (English)
0 references
5 October 2015
0 references
Let \(\Omega \subset \mathbb C^n\) be a bounded pseudoconvex domain and \(g_{\Omega} (\cdot, a)\) its pluricomplex Green function with a pole at a point \(a \in \Omega\). The following two conjectures are due to Z. Błocki and W. Zwonek: {\parindent=8mm \begin{itemize} \item[(C1)] The function \(\alpha (t):= e^{-2nt}\lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is nondecreasing on \((-\infty,0)\) \item [(C2)] The function \(\beta (t):= \log ( \lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is convex on \((-\infty,0)\). \end{itemize}} Here, \(\lambda_n\) denotes the Lebesgue measure. J. E. Fornæss has disproved (C2) by means of a triply connected domain in the plane, so the above conjectures will not hold in general. But the authors prove them under the hypothesis that \(\Omega \) is balanced. After this they consider the analogues of the functions \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) for the Green function with two poles in the case that \(\Omega\) is a planar domain. They disprove (C1) and (C2) in this case.
0 references
pluricomplex Green function
0 references
Bergman kernel
0 references
Błocki-Zwonek conjectures
0 references