Definable choice for a class of weakly o-minimal theories (Q506966): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
Let \(\mathcal{M}\) be an o-minimal group, and \(U\) be an additional unary, downward-closed relation, defining a non-rational cut in \(M\). Then \(\mathrm{Th}(\mathcal{M},U)\) is only weakly o-minimal and may be of valuational or non-valuational kind. The main result: the cut is valuational if and only if \(\mathrm{Th}(\mathcal{M},U)\) has definable Skolem functions; in both cases a stronger property, called \textit{definable choice} (the choice functions are injective with respect to fibres of definable sets), fails to happen for \(\mathrm{Th}(\mathcal{M},U)\). In the valuational case, the proof is borrowed from studying the valuational expansions of o-minimal fields (the real-closed valued fields, for example), and in the non-valuational case the analysis of dense pairs of o-minimal structures is used. The paper refers to the Ph.D. thesis of the second author [Weakly o-minimal structures and Skolem functions. Maryland, MD: University of Maryland (PhD Thesis) (2008)] giving an explicit algorithm for calculating Skolem functions for some class of models \((\mathcal{M},U)\).
Property / review text: Let \(\mathcal{M}\) be an o-minimal group, and \(U\) be an additional unary, downward-closed relation, defining a non-rational cut in \(M\). Then \(\mathrm{Th}(\mathcal{M},U)\) is only weakly o-minimal and may be of valuational or non-valuational kind. The main result: the cut is valuational if and only if \(\mathrm{Th}(\mathcal{M},U)\) has definable Skolem functions; in both cases a stronger property, called \textit{definable choice} (the choice functions are injective with respect to fibres of definable sets), fails to happen for \(\mathrm{Th}(\mathcal{M},U)\). In the valuational case, the proof is borrowed from studying the valuational expansions of o-minimal fields (the real-closed valued fields, for example), and in the non-valuational case the analysis of dense pairs of o-minimal structures is used. The paper refers to the Ph.D. thesis of the second author [Weakly o-minimal structures and Skolem functions. Maryland, MD: University of Maryland (PhD Thesis) (2008)] giving an explicit algorithm for calculating Skolem functions for some class of models \((\mathcal{M},U)\). / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Artur Piękosz / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03C64 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6680068 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
weakly o-minimal
Property / zbMATH Keywords: weakly o-minimal / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Skolem functions
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Skolem functions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
definable choice
Property / zbMATH Keywords: definable choice / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
o-minimal group
Property / zbMATH Keywords: o-minimal group / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 02:48, 1 July 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Definable choice for a class of weakly o-minimal theories
scientific article

    Statements

    Definable choice for a class of weakly o-minimal theories (English)
    0 references
    2 February 2017
    0 references
    Let \(\mathcal{M}\) be an o-minimal group, and \(U\) be an additional unary, downward-closed relation, defining a non-rational cut in \(M\). Then \(\mathrm{Th}(\mathcal{M},U)\) is only weakly o-minimal and may be of valuational or non-valuational kind. The main result: the cut is valuational if and only if \(\mathrm{Th}(\mathcal{M},U)\) has definable Skolem functions; in both cases a stronger property, called \textit{definable choice} (the choice functions are injective with respect to fibres of definable sets), fails to happen for \(\mathrm{Th}(\mathcal{M},U)\). In the valuational case, the proof is borrowed from studying the valuational expansions of o-minimal fields (the real-closed valued fields, for example), and in the non-valuational case the analysis of dense pairs of o-minimal structures is used. The paper refers to the Ph.D. thesis of the second author [Weakly o-minimal structures and Skolem functions. Maryland, MD: University of Maryland (PhD Thesis) (2008)] giving an explicit algorithm for calculating Skolem functions for some class of models \((\mathcal{M},U)\).
    0 references
    0 references
    weakly o-minimal
    0 references
    Skolem functions
    0 references
    definable choice
    0 references
    o-minimal group
    0 references