Reichenbach, Prior and hybrid tense logic (Q516424): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / review text | |||
The contributions to tense logic of Hans Reichenbach and Arthur Prior are commonly presented as rivals. \textit{A. Prior} said of Reichenbach's scheme [Past, present and future. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1967; Zbl 0169.29802)] that it is at once too simple (in that each tense has one reference point but there are examples which require two) and too complicated, in that he missed the generalisation that reference points should be iterable indefinitely. The present paper deploys what is known in the study of tenses as a hybrid logic to combine the work of Prior and of Reichenbach elegantly to provide a structure which should be of interest also to students of tense in natural languages. | |||
Property / review text: The contributions to tense logic of Hans Reichenbach and Arthur Prior are commonly presented as rivals. \textit{A. Prior} said of Reichenbach's scheme [Past, present and future. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1967; Zbl 0169.29802)] that it is at once too simple (in that each tense has one reference point but there are examples which require two) and too complicated, in that he missed the generalisation that reference points should be iterable indefinitely. The present paper deploys what is known in the study of tenses as a hybrid logic to combine the work of Prior and of Reichenbach elegantly to provide a structure which should be of interest also to students of tense in natural languages. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: J. D. MacKenzie / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03A05 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03-03 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 01A60 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B44 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6694647 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Arthur Prior | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Arthur Prior / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Hans Reichenbach | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Hans Reichenbach / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
point of reference | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: point of reference / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
hybrid logic | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: hybrid logic / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 04:15, 1 July 2023
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Reichenbach, Prior and hybrid tense logic |
scientific article |
Statements
Reichenbach, Prior and hybrid tense logic (English)
0 references
14 March 2017
0 references
The contributions to tense logic of Hans Reichenbach and Arthur Prior are commonly presented as rivals. \textit{A. Prior} said of Reichenbach's scheme [Past, present and future. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1967; Zbl 0169.29802)] that it is at once too simple (in that each tense has one reference point but there are examples which require two) and too complicated, in that he missed the generalisation that reference points should be iterable indefinitely. The present paper deploys what is known in the study of tenses as a hybrid logic to combine the work of Prior and of Reichenbach elegantly to provide a structure which should be of interest also to students of tense in natural languages.
0 references
Arthur Prior
0 references
Hans Reichenbach
0 references
point of reference
0 references
hybrid logic
0 references