Dynamics we can believe in: a view from the Amsterdam school on the centenary of Evert Willem Beth (Q542124): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
This survey presents a variety of newer modal logics, such as epistemic logic, dynamic epistemic logic, public announcement logic, doxastic-epistemic logic, all of which try to model more closely the way in which thinking takes place in a social environment (``Although in many cases we do reason in isolation, there is clearly a natural multiagent component to much of our actual reasoning. This takes two forms: we reason about other people, and also with other people.''). This is seen as having originated with Hintikka (1962). Currently, the main proponents of these logics are J. van Benthem, A. Baltag, L. Moss, and the authors. Several of the cited works are Ph.D. dissertations. Although devoted to Beth's centenary, there is no reference to any work of Beth within the paper.
Property / review text: This survey presents a variety of newer modal logics, such as epistemic logic, dynamic epistemic logic, public announcement logic, doxastic-epistemic logic, all of which try to model more closely the way in which thinking takes place in a social environment (``Although in many cases we do reason in isolation, there is clearly a natural multiagent component to much of our actual reasoning. This takes two forms: we reason about other people, and also with other people.''). This is seen as having originated with Hintikka (1962). Currently, the main proponents of these logics are J. van Benthem, A. Baltag, L. Moss, and the authors. Several of the cited works are Ph.D. dissertations. Although devoted to Beth's centenary, there is no reference to any work of Beth within the paper. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Victor V. Pambuccian / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B42 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B45 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03-03 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 01A60 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 01A65 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 5905348 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
dynamic logic
Property / zbMATH Keywords: dynamic logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
interaction
Property / zbMATH Keywords: interaction / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
information update
Property / zbMATH Keywords: information update / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
belief change
Property / zbMATH Keywords: belief change / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
epistemology
Property / zbMATH Keywords: epistemology / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
game theory
Property / zbMATH Keywords: game theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
survey paper
Property / zbMATH Keywords: survey paper / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 11:29, 1 July 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Dynamics we can believe in: a view from the Amsterdam school on the centenary of Evert Willem Beth
scientific article

    Statements

    Dynamics we can believe in: a view from the Amsterdam school on the centenary of Evert Willem Beth (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    8 June 2011
    0 references
    This survey presents a variety of newer modal logics, such as epistemic logic, dynamic epistemic logic, public announcement logic, doxastic-epistemic logic, all of which try to model more closely the way in which thinking takes place in a social environment (``Although in many cases we do reason in isolation, there is clearly a natural multiagent component to much of our actual reasoning. This takes two forms: we reason about other people, and also with other people.''). This is seen as having originated with Hintikka (1962). Currently, the main proponents of these logics are J. van Benthem, A. Baltag, L. Moss, and the authors. Several of the cited works are Ph.D. dissertations. Although devoted to Beth's centenary, there is no reference to any work of Beth within the paper.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    dynamic logic
    0 references
    interaction
    0 references
    information update
    0 references
    belief change
    0 references
    epistemology
    0 references
    game theory
    0 references
    survey paper
    0 references