On Muckenhoupt-Wheeden conjecture (Q555593): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / review text | |||
Assume that \(T\) is a Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator. It was conjectured by Muckenhoupt and Wheeden many years ago that the following inequality holds: \[ \sup_{\lambda >0} \lambda w(\{ x \in {\mathbb R}^n: | Tf(x) | > \lambda \}) \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) | Mw(x)dx, \] where \(M\) is the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator. This problem is open even for the Hilbert transform. In this direction, \textit{C. Pérez} [J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser. 49, No.~2, 296--308 (1994; Zbl 0797.42010)] proved the following: \[ \sup_{\lambda >0} \lambda w(\{ x \in {\mathbb R}^n: | Tf(x) | > \lambda \}) \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) | M^2 w(x)dx. \] The author shows that a dyadic version of Muckenhoupt-Wheeden conjecture is false. Let \(M_d\) be the dyadic maximal operator. She shows that there exists a Haar multipler \(T\) such that the inequality \[ \text{(1)} \quad \quad \sup_{\lambda >0} \lambda w(\{ x \in {\mathbb R}^n: | Tf(x) | > \lambda \}) \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) | M_dw(x)dx \] does not hold. Note that \(M_d w \leq Mw\). For the proof, she shows the following: there exist a weight \(w\) and a Haar multiplier \(T\) such that the inequality \[ \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | Tf(x) |^2 w(x)dx \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) |^2 \Big( \frac{M_d w(x)}{w(x)}\Big)^2 w(x) dx \] does not hold. Using the result by \textit{D. Cruz-Uribe} and \textit{C. Pérez} [J. Funct. Anal. 174, No.~1, 1--17 (2000; Zbl 0976.46018)], it is shown that (1) does not hold for these \(w\) and \(T\). | |||
Property / review text: Assume that \(T\) is a Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator. It was conjectured by Muckenhoupt and Wheeden many years ago that the following inequality holds: \[ \sup_{\lambda >0} \lambda w(\{ x \in {\mathbb R}^n: | Tf(x) | > \lambda \}) \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) | Mw(x)dx, \] where \(M\) is the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator. This problem is open even for the Hilbert transform. In this direction, \textit{C. Pérez} [J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser. 49, No.~2, 296--308 (1994; Zbl 0797.42010)] proved the following: \[ \sup_{\lambda >0} \lambda w(\{ x \in {\mathbb R}^n: | Tf(x) | > \lambda \}) \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) | M^2 w(x)dx. \] The author shows that a dyadic version of Muckenhoupt-Wheeden conjecture is false. Let \(M_d\) be the dyadic maximal operator. She shows that there exists a Haar multipler \(T\) such that the inequality \[ \text{(1)} \quad \quad \sup_{\lambda >0} \lambda w(\{ x \in {\mathbb R}^n: | Tf(x) | > \lambda \}) \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) | M_dw(x)dx \] does not hold. Note that \(M_d w \leq Mw\). For the proof, she shows the following: there exist a weight \(w\) and a Haar multiplier \(T\) such that the inequality \[ \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | Tf(x) |^2 w(x)dx \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) |^2 \Big( \frac{M_d w(x)}{w(x)}\Big)^2 w(x) dx \] does not hold. Using the result by \textit{D. Cruz-Uribe} and \textit{C. Pérez} [J. Funct. Anal. 174, No.~1, 1--17 (2000; Zbl 0976.46018)], it is shown that (1) does not hold for these \(w\) and \(T\). / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Yasuo Komori-Furuya / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 42B20 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 42B25 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 5931664 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
singular integral | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: singular integral / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
weight | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: weight / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Muckenhoupt-Wheeden conjecture | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Muckenhoupt-Wheeden conjecture / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 14:38, 1 July 2023
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On Muckenhoupt-Wheeden conjecture |
scientific article |
Statements
On Muckenhoupt-Wheeden conjecture (English)
0 references
25 July 2011
0 references
Assume that \(T\) is a Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator. It was conjectured by Muckenhoupt and Wheeden many years ago that the following inequality holds: \[ \sup_{\lambda >0} \lambda w(\{ x \in {\mathbb R}^n: | Tf(x) | > \lambda \}) \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) | Mw(x)dx, \] where \(M\) is the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator. This problem is open even for the Hilbert transform. In this direction, \textit{C. Pérez} [J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser. 49, No.~2, 296--308 (1994; Zbl 0797.42010)] proved the following: \[ \sup_{\lambda >0} \lambda w(\{ x \in {\mathbb R}^n: | Tf(x) | > \lambda \}) \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) | M^2 w(x)dx. \] The author shows that a dyadic version of Muckenhoupt-Wheeden conjecture is false. Let \(M_d\) be the dyadic maximal operator. She shows that there exists a Haar multipler \(T\) such that the inequality \[ \text{(1)} \quad \quad \sup_{\lambda >0} \lambda w(\{ x \in {\mathbb R}^n: | Tf(x) | > \lambda \}) \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) | M_dw(x)dx \] does not hold. Note that \(M_d w \leq Mw\). For the proof, she shows the following: there exist a weight \(w\) and a Haar multiplier \(T\) such that the inequality \[ \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | Tf(x) |^2 w(x)dx \leq C \int_{{\mathbb R}^n} | f(x) |^2 \Big( \frac{M_d w(x)}{w(x)}\Big)^2 w(x) dx \] does not hold. Using the result by \textit{D. Cruz-Uribe} and \textit{C. Pérez} [J. Funct. Anal. 174, No.~1, 1--17 (2000; Zbl 0976.46018)], it is shown that (1) does not hold for these \(w\) and \(T\).
0 references
singular integral
0 references
weight
0 references
Muckenhoupt-Wheeden conjecture
0 references