The Steiner ratio conjecture is true for five points (Q1065011)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 12:35, 6 February 2024 by Daniel (talk | contribs) (‎Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q122987645, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1707216511891)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The Steiner ratio conjecture is true for five points
scientific article

    Statements

    The Steiner ratio conjecture is true for five points (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    The long-standing conjecture of Gilbert and Pollak states that for any set of n given points in the Euclidean plane, the ratio of the length of a Steiner minimal tree and the length of a minimal spanning tree is at least \(\sqrt{3}/2\). This conjecture has been shown to be true for \(n=3\) by Gilbert and Pollak, and for \(n=4\) by Pollak. Recently, the autors used a different approach to give a shorter proof for \(n=4\). In this paper, we continue this approach to prove the conjecture for \(n=5\). Some results are useful in obtaining bounds for the ratio of two lengths in the general case. Let L(AB) denote the Euclidean distance between two points A and B and define \(L(A_ 1A_ 2...A_ n)=L(A_ 1A_ 2)+L(A_ 2A_ 3)+...+L(A_{n-1}A_ n)\). For a sequence of points \(A_ 1,A_ 2,...,A_ n\), let \(\sphericalangle A_ i\) denote the angle \(\sphericalangle A_{i-1}A_ iA_{i+1}\), the angle from line \([A_{i- 1},A_ i]\) to line \([A_{i+1},A_ i]\). The main lemma is that suppose that \(k\cdot 180-60\leq \sum^{j+k-1}_{i=j}\sphericalangle A_ i\leq k\cdot 180+60\), \(j=1,2,...,n-1\), \(k=1,2,...,n-j\), then \(L(A_ 1A_ n)\geq (\sqrt{3}/2)L(A_ 1A_ 2...A_ n).\) By Melzak's method, a Steiner minimal tree can be transfered into a segment and every spanning tree can be transfered into a path interconnecting two endpoints of the segment. By a case argument on angles, we proved that there always exists a spanning tree path which satisfies the condition of the main lemma, for \(n=5\). The same idea would work for \(n=6\). The same idea would work for \(n=6\). However, the argument becomes too complicated to be written down.
    0 references
    ratio
    0 references
    Steiner minimal tree
    0 references
    minimal spanning tree
    0 references

    Identifiers