Optimal control of parameters for elastic body with thin inclusions (Q2302743)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 16:23, 15 February 2024 by RedirectionBot (talk | contribs) (‎Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q511977)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Optimal control of parameters for elastic body with thin inclusions
scientific article

    Statements

    Optimal control of parameters for elastic body with thin inclusions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    26 February 2020
    0 references
    The authors consider a bounded domain \(\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^{2}\) with Lipschitz boundary \(\Gamma \), a smooth curve \(a_{r}\) such that \(\overline{ a_{r}}\subset \Omega \) and \(a_{e}=(-1,0)\times \{0\}\), assuming that \( a=a_{e}\cup a_{r}\cup \{0,0)\}\) is a smooth curve with a 0 angle between \( a_{e}\) and \(a_{r}\) at \((0,0)\). \(a_{e}\) and \(a_{r}\), respectively, correspond to thin elastic and rigid inclusions incorporated in the elastic material which fills in \(\Omega _{a}=\Omega \setminus \overline{a}\). The authors consider the Euler-Bernoulli beam model for \(a_{e}\) and assume that the delamination takes place at the positive side of \(a_{e}\). They define on \( H^{1}(\Omega _{a_{e}})^{2}\times H^{2}(a_{e})\times H^{1}(a_{e})\) the energy functional \[E_{\delta }(u,v,w)=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\Omega _{a}}\sigma (u)\cdot \varepsilon (u)-\int_{\Omega _{a}}g\cdot u+\frac{1}{2} \int_{a_{e}}v_{,11}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\int_{a_{e}}w_{,1}^{2}+\frac{1}{2\delta } (\rho _{2,1}(0+)-v_{,1}(0-))^{2},\] where \(g=(g_{1},g_{2})\in L^{2}(\Omega )^{2}\) are given external forces, \(\rho =(\rho _{1},\rho _{2})=u\mid _{a_{r}} \), \(\varepsilon (u)=\{\varepsilon _{ij}(u)=\frac{1}{2}(u_{i,j}+u_{j,i})\}\) is the strain tensor and \(\sigma (u)=C\varepsilon (u)\) is Hooke's law, \(C\) being the elasticity tensor which satisfies the usual symmetry and positive definite properties. They introduce the set of admissible displacements as \( P=\{(u,v,w)\in H^{1}(\Omega _{a_{e}})^{2}\times H^{2}(a_{e})\times H^{1}(a_{e}):[u_{\nu }]\geq 0\),\(\ v=u_{\nu }^{-}\), \(w=u_{\tau }^{-}\) on \( a_{e}\), \(u\mid _{a_{r}}\in R(a_{r})\}\), with \(R(a_{r})=\{\rho :\rho (x_{1},x_{2})=b(-x_{2},x_{1})+(c^{1},c^{2})\), \((x_{1},x_{2})\in a_{r}\}\) for arbitrary constants \(b\), \(c^{1}\), \(c^{2}\). To the minimization problem \( \inf_{P}E_{\delta }\), they associate a differential formulation. They prove the equivalence between these formulations, assuming that the solution is smooth and using the variational formulation: \(\int_{\Omega _{a}}\sigma (u)\cdot \varepsilon (\overline{u}-u)-\int_{\Omega _{a}}g\cdot (\overline{u} -u)+\int_{a_{e}}v_{,11}(\overline{v}_{,11}-v_{,11})+\int_{a_{e}}w_{,1}( \overline{w}_{,1}-w_{,1})+\frac{1}{\delta }(\rho _{2,1}(0+)-v_{,1}(0-))( \overline{\rho }_{2,1}(0+)-\overline{v}_{,1}(0-)-\rho _{2,1}(0+)+v_{,1}(0-))\geq 0\), for every \((\overline{u},\overline{v}, \overline{w})\in P\). Letting \(\delta \) increase to \(+\infty \), the authors prove the existence of \((u,v,w)\) such that \(u^{\delta }\rightharpoonup u\) weakly in \(H^{1}(\Omega _{a_{e}})^{2}\), \(u\mid _{a_{r}}=\rho ^{0}\in R(a_{r}) \), \((v^{\delta },w^{\delta })\rightharpoonup (v,w)\) weakly in \( H^{2}(a_{e})\times H^{1}(a_{e})\) and \((u,v,w)\in P\) is the solution of the variational inequality \(\int_{\Omega _{a}}\sigma (u)\cdot \varepsilon ( \overline{u}-u)-\int_{\Omega _{a}}g\cdot (\overline{u}-u)+ \int_{a_{e}}v_{,11}(\overline{v}_{,11}-v_{,11})+\int_{a_{e}}w_{,1}(\overline{ w}_{,1}-w_{,1})\geq 0\), for every \((\overline{u},\overline{v},\overline{w} )\in P\). The authors then consider the case where \(\delta \) goes to 0 and they describe the limit problem. In a further part of their paper, the authors add a parameter \(\lambda \) associated to the rigidity of the elastic inclusion and they describe the asymptotic behavior of the solution when \( \lambda \rightarrow \infty \). In the last part of their paper, the authors consider an optimal control problem associated to this context for which they prove an existence result. They also prove that the inverse problem has a solution.
    0 references
    thin inclusion
    0 references
    junction stiffness parameter
    0 references
    rigidity parameter
    0 references
    crack
    0 references
    variational inequality
    0 references
    junction conditions
    0 references
    optimal control problem
    0 references
    inverse problem
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references