A note on relative dimensions of rings and conductors in function fields (Q1358939)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A note on relative dimensions of rings and conductors in function fields |
scientific article |
Statements
A note on relative dimensions of rings and conductors in function fields (English)
0 references
25 May 1998
0 references
Let \(R\) be the local ring of a curve singularity and let \(K\) denote its field of fractions. Let \(\widetilde R\) denote the integral closure of \(R\) in \(K\) and let \(S\) be a ring between \(R\) and \(\widetilde R\). Let \(C\) denote the conductor ideal of \(S\) in \(R\). Let \(k\) denote the field of constants of \(K\) and put \(c(S)=\dim_k R/C\) and \(d(S)=\dim_k S/R\). In general, one has \(c(\widetilde R)\leq d(\widetilde R)\), with equality if \(R\) is Gorenstein. The author shows that \(c(S)\leq d(S)\) if \(c(S)\leq 4\), but gives an example to show that this inequality may fail when \(c(S)=5\). It is also shown that this inequality is related to a distributivity property for intersection numbers of branches by using arguments from an earlier article by \textit{A. Garcia} and \textit{R. F. Lax} [J. Algebra 178, No. 3, 807-832 (1995; Zbl 0854.14014)]. An example is given of a curve singularity with three branches such that the intersection number of one branch with the union of the other two branches is strictly greater than the sum of the intersection numbers of this branch with each of the other two branches.
0 references
curve singularity
0 references
conductor ideal
0 references
intersection number
0 references