Computing human-understandable strategies: deducing fundamental rules of poker strategy (Q1656987)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 05:36, 1 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Added link to MaRDI item.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Computing human-understandable strategies: deducing fundamental rules of poker strategy
scientific article

    Statements

    Computing human-understandable strategies: deducing fundamental rules of poker strategy (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 August 2018
    0 references
    Summary: Algorithms for equilibrium computation generally make no attempt to ensure that the computed strategies are understandable by humans. For instance the strategies for the strongest poker agents are represented as massive binary files. In many situations, we would like to compute strategies that can actually be implemented by humans, who may have computational limitations and may only be able to remember a small number of features or components of the strategies that have been computed. For example, a human poker player or military leader may not have access to large precomputed tables when making real-time strategic decisions. We study poker games where private information distributions can be arbitrary (i.e., players are dealt cards from different distributions, which depicts the phenomenon in large real poker games where at some points in the hand players have different distribution of hand strength by applying Bayes' rule given the history of play in the hand thus far). We create a large training set of game instances and solutions, by randomly selecting the information probabilities, and present algorithms that learn from the training instances to perform well in games with unseen distributions. We are able to conclude several new fundamental rules about poker strategy that can be easily implemented by humans.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    game theory
    0 references
    Nash equilibrium
    0 references
    human understandable
    0 references
    imperfect information
    0 references
    poker
    0 references
    decision tree
    0 references
    machine learning
    0 references