Approximate computation of an eigenwave from measurements of its amplitudes at a given point (Q404693)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 00:41, 9 July 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Approximate computation of an eigenwave from measurements of its amplitudes at a given point
scientific article

    Statements

    Approximate computation of an eigenwave from measurements of its amplitudes at a given point (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 September 2014
    0 references
    The authors consider the equation \[ \begin{aligned}\varphi^{(2)}+ a_1(t) \varphi^{(1)}+ a_2(t) \varphi= \lambda\varphi,\quad & \varphi\in 0,\\ \sum_{\alpha\in F} C_\alpha(x,y,z)\psi^{(\alpha)}(x,y,z)= -\lambda\psi(x,y,z),\quad & \psi(x,y,z)\not\equiv 0,\end{aligned}\tag{1} \] where \(a_1\), \(a_2\), \(C_\alpha\) are real functions. Assume that \(\cdots< c_{-1}> c_0< c_1<\cdots\) are points of nonintegrability of the functions \(a_1\), \(a_2\), \(a_1\in L^1_{\text{loc}}(c_j, c_{j+1})\), \(a_2- a^{(1)}_1\in L^1_{\text{loc}}(c_j, c_{j+1})\) for all \(j\), which permits to rewrite (1) in the form \[ (\varphi^{(1)}+ a_1(t) \varphi)^{(1)}+ (a_2(t)- a^{(1)}_1(t)) \varphi= \lambda\varphi.\tag{2} \] Under the assumption that the variables in the wave equation can be separated and its coefficients are periodic, the authors develop a classification of seismic eigenwaves. A function \(\varphi\) absolutely continuous on each closed interval is called a solution of (2), and hence of (1), if the function \(\varphi^{(1)}+ a_1\varphi\) is absolutely continuous on each closed interval and (2) holds almost everywhere. Let the functions \(a_j\) be \(T\)-periodic on \((-b,b)\), \(b\geq 2^{-1}T\), and consider the equations \[ u^{(1)}(t)= \varepsilon f(t) u(-t)+ g(t) u(t),\quad t\in (a,b),\tag{3} \] \[ v^{(1)}(t)=\varepsilon f(t)\exp\Biggl(\int^{-t}_t (g(t)- g_0(t))\,dt\Biggr)v(-t)+ g_0(t) v(t),\quad t\in (-b,b),\tag{4} \] where \(\varepsilon\) is equal either to \(1\) or \(-1\), and \(f\in L^1_{\text{loc}}(-b,b)\), \(g\in L^1_{\text{loc}}(-b,b)\). The authors suppose that \(f\in A(-b,b)\), where \(A(-b,b)\) is the set of absolutely continuous functions on the interval \((-b,b)\). Then, if \(u\) and \(v\) are solutions of (3), (4) respectively, the authors obtain the expression of \(u^{(2)}\) and \(v^{(2)}\), in Theorem 1, that admits a converse. Moreover, a function \(u\) is a solution of (3) if and only if \((u(t), u(-t))\) is a solution of the problem \[ \begin{aligned} u^{(1)}_1(t) &=\varepsilon f(t)u_2(t)+ g(t)u_1(t),\\ u^{(1)}_2(t) &= -\varepsilon f(-t)u_1(t)- g(-t) u_2(t),\\ u_1(t) &= u_2(-t).\end{aligned} \] The authors make remarks on the problems given above and use the classification of seismic eigenwaves to answer some questions as to how to specify the type and basic parameters of a wave on the basis of measurements of amplitudes, whether there exist points of chaos, and how to predict them.
    0 references
    0 references