On the unit groups of the integral group rings of metacyclic groups (Q1104391)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 16:44, 18 June 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the unit groups of the integral group rings of metacyclic groups
scientific article

    Statements

    On the unit groups of the integral group rings of metacyclic groups (English)
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    One method to tackle the so-called isomorphism problem, namely does \({\mathbb{Z}}G\cong {\mathbb{Z}}H\) imply \(G\cong H\), consists in constructing a normal complement C of G in the group of units of \({\mathbb{Z}}G\) which map to 1 in \({\mathbb{Z}}\). The best result achieved so far is the one [in J. Algebra 73, 167-185 (1981; Zbl 0484.16004)], due to \textit{G. H. Cliff}, \textit{S. K. Seghal} and \textit{A. R. Weiss}, which states that C indeed exists for certain metabelian groups G. On the other hand, \textit{K. W. Roggenkamp} and \textit{L. L. Scott} [J. Pure Appl. Algebra 27, 299-314 (1983; Zbl 0509.16006)] produced metabelian groups that do not have a normal complement C. The present paper pursues these investigations and proves that for split metacyclic groups of type \(p\rtimes m\), where m is even, \(m\dag 12\), and p is a prime, a normal complement C almost never (with respect to p) exists.
    0 references
    isomorphism problem
    0 references
    normal complement
    0 references
    group of units
    0 references
    split metacyclic groups
    0 references

    Identifiers