Positive analytic capacity but zero Buffon needle probability (Q1107661)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 15:30, 10 December 2024 by Import241208061232 (talk | contribs) (Normalize DOI.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Positive analytic capacity but zero Buffon needle probability
scientific article

    Statements

    Positive analytic capacity but zero Buffon needle probability (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    One of Vitushkin's famous questions is whether the analytic capacity \(\gamma\) (\(\cdot)\) and the Buffon length Bu(\(\cdot)\) have the same null sets. (The Buffon length of a planar set E is the average length of the orthogonal projection of E (averaging over all possible directions)). \textit{P. Mattila} proved that the answer to this question is no [Ann. Math., II. Ser. 123, 303-309 (1986; Zbl 0589.28006)]. However, Mattila's argument did not give which of the implications \[ 1)\quad \gamma (E)=0\quad \Rightarrow \quad Bu(E)=0,\quad 2)\quad Bu(E)=0\quad \Rightarrow \quad \gamma (E)=0 \] are false. In this paper an explicit construction is given of a set \(E_ 0\) such that \(\gamma (E_ 0)=1\) and \(Bu(E_ 0)=0\). \(E_ 0\) is a ``crank'', i.e. a limit of certain families of line segments parallel to the x-axis.
    0 references
    analytic capacity
    0 references
    Buffon length
    0 references
    null sets
    0 references
    crank
    0 references

    Identifiers