A new system of proof-theoretic ordinal functions (Q1109029)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 15:54, 13 November 2024 by Daniel (talk | contribs) (‎Created claim: DBLP publication ID (P1635): journals/apal/Buchholz86, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1731508824982)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A new system of proof-theoretic ordinal functions
scientific article

    Statements

    A new system of proof-theoretic ordinal functions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1986
    0 references
    In this paper we present a family of ordinal functions \(\psi_ v(v\leq \omega)\), which seems to provide the so far simplest method for denoting large constructive ordinals. These functions are a simplified version of the \(\theta\)-functions, but nevertheless have the same strength as those. In Section 1 we define the functions \(\psi_ v\) and prove their main properties. In Section 2 we define a primitive recursive notation system (OT,\(\prec)\) based on the functions \(\psi_ v\). This system has the great advantage that its ordering relation \(\prec\) is very simple and can be defined without reference to sets of coefficients or any similar concept. OT is introduced as a subset of a larger set T of terms, which plays an important role in Section 3. There we show that the statement \(PRWO(\psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega})\), which says that there exist no primitive recursive infinite descending sequences in (\(\{\) \(x\in OT:\) \(x\prec \psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega}\},\prec)\), is not provable in \(\Pi^ 1_ 1-CA_ 0\). The proof of \(\Pi^ 1_ 1-CA_ 0\nvdash PRWO(\psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega})\) is based on the following results of \textit{W. Buchholz} [ibid. 33, 131-155 (1987; Zbl 0636.03052)]: \(ID_{\nu}\nvdash \forall n \exists k c^ n_{\nu}(k)=0\) (\(\nu\leq \omega)\), where \(c^ n_{\nu}(k)\in T\), for all \(n,k\in {\mathbb{N}}\); and every sequence \((c^ n_{\nu}(k))_{k\in {\mathbb{N}}}\) is primitive recursive. In Section 3 we prove \(c^ n_{\nu}(k)\in OT\) and \((c^ n_{\nu}(k)\neq 0\Rightarrow c^ n_{\nu}(k+1)\prec c^ n_{\nu}(k)).\) Since for all \(\nu <\omega\) we have \(c^ n_{\nu}(k)\prec \psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega}\), it follows that PRWO \((\psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega})\) implies \(\forall \nu <\omega \forall n \exists k c^ n_{\nu}(k)=0\). Since this can be proved in Peano Arithmetic and since \(\Pi^ 1_ 1-CA_ 0\) is conservative over \(\cup_{\nu <\omega}ID_{\nu}\) with respect to arithmetic sentences, we obtain now \(\Pi^ 1_ 1-CA_ 0\nvdash PRWO(\psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega})\).
    0 references
    ordinal functions
    0 references
    large constructive ordinals
    0 references
    primitive recursive notation system
    0 references

    Identifiers