New lower bounds for the topological complexity of aspherical spaces (Q2344327)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 09:10, 3 August 2023 by Importer (talk | contribs) (‎Created a new Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
New lower bounds for the topological complexity of aspherical spaces
scientific article

    Statements

    New lower bounds for the topological complexity of aspherical spaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 May 2015
    0 references
    The topological complexity \(\text{TC}(X)\) of a space \(X\) is the sectional category (or Schwarz genus) of the free path fibration \(\pi _X:X^I\rightarrow X\times X\), \(\pi _X(\alpha )=(\alpha (0),\alpha (1)).\) This numerical homotopy invariant was introduced by \textit{M. Farber} in [Discrete Comput. Geom. 29 No.2, 211-221 (2003; Zbl 1038.68130)] in order to give a topological approach to the motion planning problem in robotics. In the paper under review, the authors deal with the following interesting open problem posed by Farber: for any discrete group \(G\), give a description of \(\text{TC}(G):=\text{TC}(K(G,1))\) in terms of the algebraic properties of \(G\) (here, \(K(G,1)\) denotes the Eilenberg-MacLane space). Their main result is the following theorem: {Theorem}. Let \(G\) be a discrete group, and let \(A\) and \(B\) be subgroups of \(G.\) If \((gAg^{-1})\cap B=\{1\},\) then \(\text{TC}(G)\geq \text{cd}(A\times B)\), i.e. the cohomological dimension of the group \(A\times B\) is a lower bound of \(\text{TC}(G).\) The authors also present several illustrative examples where their theorem can be successfully applied. Concretely, for right-angled Artin groups, pure braid groups and the fundamental group of the Borromean rings link complement they recover the lower bounds obtained by other techniques. Finally, using this theorem they show that the topological complexity of Higman's group \(\mathcal{H}\) is 4. Such a computation could not be obtained using the standard techniques of zero-divisors cup-length or sectional category weight as it is difficult to distinguish the group \(\mathcal{H}\) from a trivial group using cohomological invariants.
    0 references
    topological complexity
    0 references
    aspherical spaces
    0 references
    Lusternik-Schnirelmann category
    0 references
    cohomological dimension
    0 references
    topological robotics
    0 references
    infinite groups
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references