Gompertz survival kinetics: Fall in number alive or growth in number dead? (Q1898349)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 13:46, 1 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Added link to MaRDI item.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Gompertz survival kinetics: Fall in number alive or growth in number dead?
scientific article

    Statements

    Gompertz survival kinetics: Fall in number alive or growth in number dead? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    16 July 1996
    0 references
    Basing their conclusion on impressively large numbers, \textit{J. R. Carey} et al. [Science 258, 457-461, 398 (1992)] \((> 1.2\) million medflies, Ceratitis capitata) and \textit{J. W. Cursinger} et al. [ibid., 461-463 (1992)] (hundreds of Drosophila melanogaster of different genotypes) suggest that the classical Gompertz model of survival is deficient in that it predicts for the older individuals a higher mortality rate than is observed, specifically for fruit flies and, possibly, other organisms. However, it appears that the survival of the older individuals is ``exceptional'' only because the standard survivorship equation (Gompertz, 1825) is not, at least for Mediterranean fruit flies (Carey et al., 1992), an appropriate application of Gompertz kinetics. In generalized Gompertz kinetics, the rate coefficient, \(r\), of an exponentially increasing or decreasing process \(dy/dx = \pm r \cdot y\) may itself change exponentially in a positive or negative direction, i.e., \(dr/dt = \pm k \cdot r\). When the appropriate form of this model is used, the proportional demise of the older subjects in the Carey et al. (1992) data follows the same rule as the rest of the population.
    0 references
    classical Gompertz model of survival
    0 references
    survival of the older individuals
    0 references
    generalized Gompertz kinetics
    0 references

    Identifiers