Linearization of generalized interval exchange maps (Q1928615)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Linearization of generalized interval exchange maps |
scientific article |
Statements
Linearization of generalized interval exchange maps (English)
0 references
3 January 2013
0 references
Let \(I\) be an open bounded interval. A generalized interval exchange map (g.i.e.m.) \(T\) on \(I\) is defined by the following data. Let \({\mathcal A}\) be an alphabet with \(d \geq 2\) symbols. Consider ``top'' and ``bottom'' partitions of \(I\) into \(d\) open subintervals indexed by \({\mathcal A}\). More precisely, the top partition is defined by its singularity points \(u_0^t < u_1^t < \cdots < u_d^t\), where \(I=(u_0^t, u_d^t)\), and a bijection \(\pi_t : {\mathcal A} \rightarrow \{ 1,\ldots,d \}\); then \(I_{\alpha}^t = (u_{\pi_t(\alpha) -1}, u_{\pi_t(\alpha)})\) for each \(\alpha \in {\mathcal A}\) and \(I=\sqcup I^t_{\alpha}\) modulo points \(u_j^t\). The definition of the bottom partition \(I=\sqcup I^b_{\alpha}\) is similar, just replace the letter \(t\) by the letter \(b\). It is also required that \(\pi_t^{-1}(\{1,\ldots,k \}) \not= \pi_b^{-1}(\{ 1,\ldots,k \})\) for all \(k=1,\ldots,d-1\). Consider also a \((d \times d)\)-antisymmetric matrix \(\Omega\), whose element \(\Omega_{\alpha\beta}\) equals \((+1)\) if \(\pi_t(\alpha) < \pi_t(\beta)\) and \(\pi_b(\alpha) > \pi_b(\beta)\), equals \((-1)\) if \(\pi_t(\alpha) > \pi_t(\beta)\) and \(\pi_b(\alpha) < \pi_b(\beta)\), and equals \(0\) otherwise. Then the g.i.e.m. \(T\) is defined on \(\sqcup I^t_{\alpha}\) and its restriction on each \(I^t_{\alpha}\) is an orientation-preserving homeomorphism onto the corresponding \(I^b_{\alpha}\). A g.i.e.m. \(T_0\) is ``standard'' if \(|I^t_{\alpha}|=|I^b_{\alpha}|\) for each \(\alpha \in {\mathcal A}\), and the restriction of \(T_0\) on each \(I^t_{\alpha}\) is a translation. We say that a g.i.e.m. \(T\) is a simple deformation of a standard i.e.m. \(T_0\) if: (i) \(T\) and \(T_0\) have the same discontinuities, (ii) \(T\) and \(T_0\) coincide in the neighborhood of each discontinuity and of the endpoints of \(I\), (iii) \(T\) is a \(C^r\)-diffeomorphism on each \(I^t_{\alpha}\). The main result of the paper is a local conjugacy theorem, which, stated in particular generality (for simple deformations), can be summarized as follows. {Theorem.} For almost all standard i.e.m. \(T_0\) and for any integer \(r \geq 2\) amongst the \(C^{r+3}\)-simple deformations of \(T_0\), those that are \(C^r\)-conjugate to \(T_0\) by a diffeomorphism \(C^r\)-close to the identity form a \(C^1\)-submanifold of codimension \(d^*=d + (r-\tfrac{1}{2})\cdot \text{rank\,} \Omega - 2r\).
0 references
maps of the interval
0 references
conjugacy
0 references
Arnold diffusion
0 references
classification
0 references
continued fractions
0 references
invariants
0 references
KAM theory
0 references
moduli
0 references
normal forms
0 references
perturbations
0 references
small divisors
0 references
topological and differentiable equivalence
0 references