Uniqueness of DRS as the 2 operator resolvent-splitting and impossibility of 3 operator resolvent-splitting (Q2191769)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 02:58, 19 April 2024 by Importer (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Uniqueness of DRS as the 2 operator resolvent-splitting and impossibility of 3 operator resolvent-splitting
scientific article

    Statements

    Uniqueness of DRS as the 2 operator resolvent-splitting and impossibility of 3 operator resolvent-splitting (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    26 June 2020
    0 references
    The author explores two natural extension questions concerning the celebrated Douglas-Rachford splitting for proximal point algorithms and shows that it is the unique resolvent-splitting procedure for two maximally monotone operators, while a generalization of it to three such operators is impossible without avoiding the undesired effect of enlarging the problem size. Additionally, a novel resolvent-splitting method for three maximally monotone operators with provably minimal lifting that directly generalizes the Douglas-Rachford procedure is proposed. Numerical examples in signal denoising with outliers, portfolio optimization, and Poisson denoising with \(1D\) total variation illustrate the theoretical achievements.
    0 references
    Douglas-Rachford splitting
    0 references
    splitting methods
    0 references
    maximal monotone operators
    0 references
    lower bounds
    0 references
    first-order methods
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references