A consistent co-rotational finite element formulation for geometrically nonlinear dynamic analysis of 3-D beams (Q1971331)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 21:25, 26 June 2024 by Daniel (talk | contribs) (‎Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q126645592, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1719433555324)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A consistent co-rotational finite element formulation for geometrically nonlinear dynamic analysis of 3-D beams
scientific article

    Statements

    A consistent co-rotational finite element formulation for geometrically nonlinear dynamic analysis of 3-D beams (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    11 August 2002
    0 references
    This paper is concerned with the construction of finite element approximations to the problem of beams undergoing large displacements in three dimensions, in dynamic situations. The authors adopt a co-rotational approach, with consistent linearization of geometrically nonlinear terms, to obtain the inertial and force terms. The formulation is restricted to prismatic Euler-Bernoulli beams having doubly-symmetric cross-sections, strains are assumed to be small. The point of departure is the element proposed by the first author in [AIAA J. 30, 797-804 (1992)]; this element has two nodes with six degrees of freedom per node: three components of displacement, and three of rotation. The components of lateral displacement of the centroidal axis are approximated by Hermitian polynomials, and the rotation is approximated by a linear polynomial. The authors give an explicit and detailed derivation of various element matrices and vectors in the local element coordinate system, which is updated at each iteration. The iterative procedure is based on Newmark method, and nonlinearities are approximated through the use of Newton-Raphson method. An extensive range of examples is presented. These include a flexible flying beam, a right-angled cantilever, and a right-angled beam in free flight. In all the cases the agreement with analytical results, where available, or with numerical results of others, is very good.
    0 references
    geometrically nonlinear dynamic analysis
    0 references
    finite element approximations
    0 references
    large displacements
    0 references
    co-rotational approach
    0 references
    linearization
    0 references
    prismatic Euler-Bernoulli beams
    0 references
    Hermitian polynomials
    0 references
    linear polynomial
    0 references
    local element coordiante system
    0 references
    iterative procedure
    0 references
    Newmark method
    0 references
    Newton-Raphson method
    0 references
    flexible flying beam
    0 references
    right-angled cantilever
    0 references
    right-angled beam
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers