Convexity and Teichmüller spaces (Q2357040)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 23:32, 13 July 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Convexity and Teichmüller spaces
scientific article

    Statements

    Convexity and Teichmüller spaces (English)
    0 references
    16 June 2017
    0 references
    It is well known that the Teichmüller spaces with their canonical complex structure are pseudoconvex. Moreover, all finite-dimensional Teichmüller spaces are Runge domains, hence polynomially convex. An old open question in this theory is whether any finite- or infinite-dimensional Teichmüller space \(T(\Gamma)\) (of dimension greater than one) is biholomorphically equivalent to a convex domain in a complex Banach space \(X\) (of the same dimension as \(T(\Gamma)\)). It was posed for finite-dimensional spaces by Royden and for the universal Teichmüller space by Sullivan. The author provides a negative answer to Royden's problem whether any finite-dimensional Teichmüller space of dimension greater than 1 is biholomorphically equivalent to a bounded convex domain in complex Euclidean space. He proves that any Teichmüller space \(T(0,n)\) of punctured spheres with a sufficiently large number \(n \geq n_{0} > 4\) of punctures cannot be mapped biholomorphically onto a bounded convex domain in \(\mathbb C^{n}.\)
    0 references
    Teichmüller space
    0 references
    convex domain
    0 references
    biholomorphic equivalence
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers