Optimal frame designs for multitasking devices with weight restrictions (Q1987758)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 09:11, 22 July 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Optimal frame designs for multitasking devices with weight restrictions
scientific article

    Statements

    Optimal frame designs for multitasking devices with weight restrictions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    15 April 2020
    0 references
    This paper is on the design of optimal frames with weight restriction. Given a dimension sequence \(\mathfrak{d}=(d_1,\dots, d_m)\in\mathbb{N}^m\) and a positive weight sequence \(\alpha = (\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n)\), the paper considers the so-called \((\alpha,\mathfrak{d})\)-design. That is, the \(m\)-tuples \(\Phi=(\mathcal{F}_1,\dots,\mathcal{F}_m)\) such that each \(\mathcal{F}_j = \{f_{ij}\}_{i=1,\dots,n}\) is a finite sequence of vectors in \(\mathbb{C}^{d_j}\) for \(j=1,\dots, m\) and \[ \sum_{j=1}^m {\|f_{ij}\|^2}=\alpha_i,\quad i=1,\ldots,n. \] Using the notation of majorization between vectors, the paper continues to focus on two tasks: 1) Characterization for the existence of \((\alpha,\mathfrak{d})\)-designs with prescribed spectral structure \(\mathcal{M}=(\mu_1,\ldots,\mu_m)\), where each \(\mu_j=(\mu_{ij})_{i=1}^{d_j}\) is a nonnegative vector in \(\mathbb{R}^{d_j}\). This is with respect to the \((\alpha,\mathcal{M})\)-admissible pair; i.e., there exists an \((\alpha,\mathfrak{d})\)-design \(\Phi=(\mathcal{F}_j)_{j=1}^m\) such that the spectra of the frame operator \(S_{\mathcal{F_j}}\) satisfy \[ \lambda(S_{\mathcal{F}_j}) = \mu_j, \quad j =1,\ldots, m. \] Such a characterization is given in Theorem 3.5. 2) The construction of an optimal \((\alpha,\mathfrak{d})\)-design \(\Phi^{opt}=(\mathcal{F}_j^{opt})_{j=1}^m\) in the sense that it is the minimizer of the joint convex potential \[ P_\varphi(\Phi):=\sum_{j=1}^m P_\varphi(\mathcal{F}_j)=\sum_{j=1}^m \mathrm{tr}\varphi(S_{\mathcal{F}_j}), \] for any convex function \(\varphi:[0,\infty)\rightarrow [0,\infty)\). That is, \[ \Phi^{opt} =\arg\min_{\Phi} P_\varphi(\Phi). \] Such a construction is based on Theorem 3.11. The main conclusion is given in Theorem 3.15, which in particular says that for an \((\alpha,\mathfrak{d})\)-design \(\Phi=(\mathcal{F}_j)_{j=1}^m\), if it is a global minimizer of \(P_{\varphi}\) for a specific \(\varphi\) and \(P_\varphi(\Phi)=P_{\varphi}(\Phi^{opt})\), then each \(\mathcal{F}_j\) is a frame for \(\mathbb{C}^{d_j}\). Examples are given in the last part of the paper.
    0 references
    frames
    0 references
    frame designs
    0 references
    convex potentials
    0 references
    majorization
    0 references
    optimal frame design
    0 references

    Identifiers