The union of a Riesz set and a Lust-Piquard set is a Riesz set (Q2491628)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 15:23, 24 June 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The union of a Riesz set and a Lust-Piquard set is a Riesz set
scientific article

    Statements

    The union of a Riesz set and a Lust-Piquard set is a Riesz set (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    29 May 2006
    0 references
    In the paper under review the authors are interested in the stability of the class of Riesz sets by union. Let \(G\) be a~compact abelian group and \(\Gamma\) be its discrete dual group. A~set \(\Lambda\subseteq\Gamma\) is called a~Riesz set if every \(\mathcal M_\Lambda(G)=L^1_\Lambda(G)\), where \(\mathcal M(G)\) denotes the space of all regular Borel measures on~\(G\), \(L^1(G)\) is its subspace of absolutely continuous measures, and the subscript~\(\Lambda\) expresses that we are interested only in those measures~\(\mu\) whose Fourier coefficients \(\widehat\mu(\gamma)=\int_G\overline\gamma\,d\mu\) vanish outside~\(\lambda\) (\(\overline\gamma\) denotes the character associated with~\(\gamma\)). An invariant mean~\(M\) on~\(L^\infty(G)\) is a~continuous linear functional such that \(M(1)=\| M\| =1\) and \(M(f_x)=M(f)\) for every \(f\in L^\infty(G)\) and \(x\in G\) where \(f_x(t)=f(t-x)\). A~function \(f\in L^\infty(G)\) is said to have a~unique invariant mean if \(M(f)=\widehat f(0)\) for every invariant mean~\(M\). A~set \(\Lambda\subseteq\Gamma\) is called a~Lust-Piquard set (or also totally ergodic) if \(\gamma f\) has a~unique invariant mean for every \(f\in L^\infty_\Lambda(G)\) and every \(\gamma\in\Gamma\). The authors prove that the union of a~Riesz set and a~Lust-Piquard set is a~Riesz set. Several results of other authors are consequences of this theorem: The union of a~Rosenthal set and a~Riesz set is a~Riesz set because every Rosenthal set is a~Lust-Piquard set; every Lust-Piquard set is a~Riesz set; for \(G=\mathbb R/\mathbb Z\), \(\mathbb N\) is not a~Lust-Piquard subset of~\(\mathbb Z\) since \(\mathbb Z^-\)~is a~Riesz set and \(\mathbb Z\) is not; and others. Finally, the authors give an example of a~Rosenthal subset of~\(\mathbb Z\) which is dense in~\(\mathbb Z\) for the Bohr topology.
    0 references
    Bishop-Rudin-Carleson theorem
    0 references
    ergodic sets
    0 references
    invariant means
    0 references
    Lust-Piquard sets
    0 references
    Riesz sets
    0 references

    Identifiers