Optimal arrangements in packing congruent balls in a spherical container (Q878077)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 15:57, 6 July 2023 by Importer (talk | contribs) (‎Created a new Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Optimal arrangements in packing congruent balls in a spherical container
scientific article

    Statements

    Optimal arrangements in packing congruent balls in a spherical container (English)
    0 references
    26 April 2007
    0 references
    The paper under review considers the following packing problem: Given a positive integer \(n\), find the minimum radius \(\rho_d(n)\) of a spherical container in \(R^d\;(d\geq 2)\) that can hold \(n\) unit balls, and determine all possible configurations of the set of the centers of the \(n\) balls (up to an isometry). Davenport and Hajos (1951), and, independently, \textit{R. A. Rankin} [Proc. Glasg. Math. Assoc. 2, 139--144 (1955; Zbl 0065.15601)], proved that if \(F\) is a set of \(d+2\) points in the unit ball in \(R^d\), then two of the points in \(F\) are at a distance of at most \(\sqrt{2}\) from each other. Rankin proved also that if \(F\) consists of \(2d\) points in the ball such that the distance between any two of them is at least \(\sqrt{2}\), then their configuration is unique up to an isometry, namely the points must be the vertices of a regular \(d\)-dimensional crosspolytope inscribed in the ball. However, if \(d+2 \leq n \leq 2d -1\), then the optimal arrangements of \(n\) points (i.e. those that maximize the distance between them) are not unique. The authors generalize these previous results by describing all possible optimal configurations, unique or not, of \(n=d+2, d+3, \ldots, 2d \) points.
    0 references

    Identifiers