A fair and efficient solution to the socialist millionaires' problem

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 00:44, 30 January 2024 by Import240129110155 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110155)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:5939234

DOI10.1016/S0166-218X(00)00342-5zbMath0978.68062DBLPjournals/dam/BoudotST01OpenAlexW2172042295WikidataQ60174463 ScholiaQ60174463MaRDI QIDQ5939234

Fabrice Boudot, Berry Schoenmakers, Jacques Traoré

Publication date: 30 October 2001

Published in: Discrete Applied Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-218x(00)00342-5




Related Items (38)

Efficient set intersection with simulation-based securityMultiparty Proximity Testing with Dishonest Majority from Equality TestingAn efficient quantum private comparison of equality over collective-noise channelsPrivate comparison protocol for multiple semi-quantum users based on Bell statesDynamic multi-party quantum private comparison protocol with single photons in both polarization and spatial-mode degrees of freedomElectronic jury voting protocolsMulti-party quantum private comparison based on the entanglement swapping of \(d\)-level cat states and \(d\)-level Bell statesAn efficient protocol for the secure multi-party quantum summationSemi-quantum private comparison based on Bell statesThe complete new solutions to the blind millionaires' problem in \(d\)-dimensional quantum systemQuantum private comparison protocol based on four-particle GHZ statesCryptanalysis and improvement in semi-quantum private comparison based on Bell statesEfficient multiparty quantum private comparison protocol based on single photons and rotation encryptionNew quantum private comparison protocol using EPR pairsA protocol for the quantum private comparison of equality with \(\chi \)-type stateA novel quantum identity authentication protocol without entanglement and preserving pre-shared key informationQuantum private comparison using genuine four-particle entangled statesQuantum private comparison protocol based on entanglement swapping of \(d\)-level Bell statesComment on quantum private comparison protocols with a semi-honest third partyEfficient quantum private comparison employing single photons and collective detectionMulti-user private comparison protocol using GHZ class statesSecure quantum private comparison of equality based on asymmetric \(W\) stateOrthogonal-state-based and semi-quantum protocols for quantum private comparison in noisy environmentMulti-party quantum private comparison protocol using \(d\)-dimensional basis states without entanglement swappingQuantum private comparison of equality protocol without a third partyCryptanalysis and improvement of several quantum private comparison protocolsMulti-party quantum private comparison protocol with \(n\)-level entangled statesMulti-party quantum private comparison based on entanglement swapping of Bell entangled states within \(d\)-level quantum systemMulti-party quantum private comparison of size relation with \(d\)-level single-particle statesProving possession of arbitrary secrets while not giving them away: New protocols and a proof in GNY logicCryptanalysis of the quantum private comparison protocol based on the entanglement swapping between three-particle W-class state and Bell stateFair Threshold Decryption with Semi-Trusted Third PartiesUniversally Composable Private Proximity TestingEfficient quantum private comparison based on entanglement swapping of Bell statesCircular multi-party quantum private comparison with \(n\)-level single-particle statesCryptanalysis and improvement of the quantum private comparison protocol with semi-honest third partyRobust semi-quantum private comparison protocols against collective noises with decoherence-free statesComment on ``Efficient and feasible quantum private comparison of equality against the collective amplitude damping noise



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: A fair and efficient solution to the socialist millionaires' problem