Exact balancing is not always good (Q1072369)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 01:10, 31 January 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Added link to MaRDI item.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Exact balancing is not always good
scientific article

    Statements

    Exact balancing is not always good (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1986
    0 references
    The following recurrence relation frequently occurs in the analysis of divide-and-conquer algorithms: \[ M_ f(0)=0,\quad M_ f(n+1)=f(n+1)+\min_{i+j=n}(M_ f(i)+M_ f(j)). \] In these applications, f is the cost of merging two subproblems, wereas \(M_ f(i)\) and \(M_ f(j)\) are the costs of solving each subproblem; f is monotonic nondecreasing. In this paper we consider such recurrences, when f is not assumed to be convex.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    balanced trees
    0 references
    optimization problem on binary trees
    0 references
    analysis of divide- and-conquer algorithms
    0 references
    merging
    0 references