The root number class and Chinburg's second invariant (Q1204382)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 06:11, 31 January 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Added link to MaRDI item.)





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The root number class and Chinburg's second invariant
scientific article

    Statements

    The root number class and Chinburg's second invariant (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    28 March 1993
    0 references
    Let \(N/K\) be a finite normal extension of number fields, \(G=\text{Gal}(N/K)\), \(D=\mathbb{Z}[G]\). The ring of integers \({\mathcal O}_ N\) defines a class \(\Omega_ a(N/K)=({\mathcal O}_ N)-[K: \mathbb{Q}](D)\) in the class-group \(C\ell(D)\) (= the finite torsion subgroup of \(K_ 0(D))\). In Invent. Math. 63, 41-79 (1981; Zbl 0469.12003), \textit{M. J. Taylor} proved Fröhlich's conjecture, that \(\Omega_ a(N/K)\) is equal to the root number class \(W_{N/K}\) defined by means of the Artin root numbers of the irreducible symplectic representations of \(G\). Moreover, in Ann. Math., II. Ser. 121, 351-376 (1985; Zbl 0567.12010), \textit{T. Chinburg} defined Galois invariants \(\Omega(N/K,i)\), \(i=1,2,3\) in \(C\ell(D)\) and proved that \(\Omega(N/K,2)=\Omega_ a(N/K)\) for tamely ramified \(N/K\). He also conjectured that \(\Omega(N/K,2)=W_{N/K}\) for all \(N/K\). In the present paper, the author proves Chinburg's conjecture in the case where \(K=\mathbb{Q}\), \(G\simeq\mathbb{H}_ 8\) and 2 is not totally ramified in \(N\).
    0 references
    ring of integers
    0 references
    class-group
    0 references
    root number class
    0 references
    Galois invariants
    0 references
    Chinburg's conjecture
    0 references

    Identifiers