The ``essential tension at work in qualitative analysis: A case study of the opposite points of view of Poincaré and Enriques on the relationships between analysis and geometry

DOI10.1006/hmat.1998.2211zbMath0917.01021OpenAlexW1992266518MaRDI QIDQ1282318

Giorgio Israel, Marta Menghini

Publication date: 2 August 1999

Published in: Historia Mathematica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/hmat.1998.2211

zbMATH Keywords

philosophyquantitative analysisphysicsmetaphysicsmethodology of science

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics in the 19th century (01A55)

Related Items (1)

Diagrams in the theory of differential equations (eighteenth to nineteenth centuries)

Cites Work

• Notes on the correspondence between Luigi Cremona and Max Noether
• 1830--1930: a century of geometry. Epistemology, history and mathematics. Selection of articles based on lectures presented at the international conference
• Nineteenth century anticipations of modern theory of dynamical systems
• Oscar II's prize competition and the error in Poincaré's memoir on the three body problem
• Poincaré's discovery of homoclinic points
• Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: The ``essential tension at work in qualitative analysis: A case study of the opposite points of view of Poincaré and Enriques on the relationships between analysis and geometry