Undecidability of theories of Boolean algebras with selected ideals (Q1092889)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 19:01, 12 July 2023 by Importer (talk | contribs) (‎Created a new Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Undecidability of theories of Boolean algebras with selected ideals
scientific article

    Statements

    Undecidability of theories of Boolean algebras with selected ideals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1986
    0 references
    Main result: Let (A,I) be a countable Boolean algebra with a selected ideal I. Then the theory of (A,I) is decidable iff A is superatomic. To prove necessity, it is shown how to obtain in an atomless B, for any \(k\in \omega\) a formula \(\psi_ k(z)\), in the language of Boolean algebras with a selected ideal, and for any (infinite) set \(A\subseteq \omega\) an ideal \(I_ A\) of B, such that \((B,I_ A)\vDash \exists z \psi_ k(z)\) iff \(k\in A.\) As to sufficiency, it is shown that the theory of (A,I), when A is superatomic, is (recursively) axiomatizable. The main tool is the construction of three mappings \(r_ 1,r_ 2,r_ 3\) from A into \(\omega\cup \{\infty \}\) with the properties: i) For \(x\in A\), \(x\in I\) iff \(r_ 3(x)\leq 1\); ii) for \(x\in A\), there are x', x'' such that \(x=x'\vee x''\), \(x'\wedge x''=0\) and \(r_ 2(x')=r_ 2(x'')=0\); iii) each statement \(``r_ j(\ell_ A)=n_ j''\) \((j=1,2,3)\) is equivalent to a r.e. set of formulas. It is shown that if (A,I) and (A',I') are both atomic and satisfy i) and ii), then they are elementary equivalent iff \(r_ j(\ell_ A)=r_ j(\ell_{A'})\) for \(j=1,2,3\).
    0 references
    0 references
    recursive axiomatizability
    0 references
    decidability
    0 references
    countable Boolean algebra
    0 references
    selected ideal
    0 references

    Identifiers