A comparison of various noncommuting conditions in metric fixed point theory and their applications (Q2017375)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A comparison of various noncommuting conditions in metric fixed point theory and their applications |
scientific article |
Statements
A comparison of various noncommuting conditions in metric fixed point theory and their applications (English)
0 references
20 March 2015
0 references
It is well known that transforming a fixed point result for a single-valued mapping \(f:X\to X\) under some contractive-type condition into a common fixed point for two mappings \(f,g:X\to X\) usually requires some commutativity-type condition for these mappings. The article under review is a very good survey of various conditions of this kind that have appeared in the literature during more than three decades. Namely, the authors list and discuss more than 40 conditions, starting from the notion of weakly commuting mappings of \textit{S. Sessa} [Publ. Inst. Math., Nouv. Sér. 32(46), 149--153 (1982; Zbl 0523.54030)]. In most cases, examples are provided showing the difference between introduced concepts. Also, the (non)-usefulness of these concepts in coincidence and common fixed point results is discussed. The (far from complete) list of 144 references shows that the related problems attracted a lot of researchers. Finally, some of many possible applications of coincidence and common fixed point results (here, to differential equations and approximation theory) are presented as illustrations.
0 references
common fixed point
0 references
\(R\)-weakly commuting mappings, compatible mappings
0 references
weakly compatible mappings
0 references
starshaped set
0 references
best approximation
0 references
best simultaneous approximation
0 references
convex metric space
0 references
nonexpansive mapping
0 references
\(R\)-subcommuting
0 references
\(R\)-subweakly commuting mappings
0 references