Algorithms for propositional model counting

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 11:05, 2 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:2266937


DOI10.1016/j.jda.2009.06.002zbMath1214.05166MaRDI QIDQ2266937

Stefan Szeider, Marko Samer

Publication date: 26 February 2010

Published in: Journal of Discrete Algorithms (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jda.2009.06.002


05C85: Graph algorithms (graph-theoretic aspects)


Related Items

Unnamed Item, Unnamed Item, D-FLAT: Declarative problem solving using tree decompositions and answer-set programming, Unnamed Item, Unnamed Item, Unnamed Item, A Study of Symmetry Breaking Predicates and Model Counting, Sum-of-Products with Default Values: Algorithms and Complexity Results, Default logic and bounded treewidth, Parameterised complexity of model checking and satisfiability in propositional dependence logic, Backdoors to q-Horn, Model counting for CNF formulas of bounded modular treewidth, Satisfiability of acyclic and almost acyclic CNF formulas, A new probabilistic constraint logic programming language based on a generalised distribution semantics, On the construction of graphs with a planar bipartite double cover from Boolean formulas and its application to counting satisfying solutions, ProCount: weighted projected model counting with graded project-join trees, Generating clause sequences of a CNF formula, On efficiently solvable cases of quantum \(k\)-SAT, New width parameters for SAT and \#SAT, Definability for model counting, On preprocessing techniques and their impact on propositional model counting, Treewidth-aware reductions of normal \textsc{ASP} to \textsc{SAT} - is normal \textsc{ASP} Harder than \textsc{SAT} after all?, Solving projected model counting by utilizing treewidth and its limits, Backdoors to Satisfaction, An Upper Bound for Resolution Size: Characterization of Tractable SAT Instances, Satisfiability of Acyclic and almost Acyclic CNF Formulas (II), Community Structure Inspired Algorithms for SAT and #SAT



Cites Work