A characterization of two disproportionality and malapportionment indices: the Duncan and Duncan index and the Lijphart index

DOI10.1007/s10479-018-3073-yzbMath1430.91038OpenAlexW2894907057WikidataQ129162478 ScholiaQ129162478MaRDI QIDQ2288964

Thierry Marchant, Marc Pirlot, Denis Bouyssou

Publication date: 20 January 2020

Published in: Annals of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8590773

zbMATH Keywords

proportional representationmalapportionmentdisproportionality indexDuncan and DuncanLijphartLoosemore-Hanby

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Voting theory (91B12)

Related Items

Axiomatic characterization of the \(\chi^2\) dissimilarity measure, On the measurement of electoral volatility, The size of the maximum antichains in products of linear orders, “One Man, One Vote” Part 2: Measurement of Malapportionment and Disproportionality and the Lorenz Curve A: Introduction and Measurement Tools

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Following the traces: an introduction to conjoint measurement without transitivity and additivity
• Some remarks on the concept of proportionality
• Measuring disproportionality, volatility and malapportionment: axiomatization and solutions
• The meaning and measurement of income mobility
• On the axiomatic method and its recent applications to game theory and resource allocation
• Measurement of disproportionality in proportional representation systems
• Comparison of indices of disproportionality in PR systems
• The Quota Method of Apportionment
• An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM. II: M ore than two categories