Perturbed datasets methods for hypothesis testing and structure of corresponding confidence sets
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2342551
DOI10.1016/j.automatica.2014.10.083zbMath1309.93142arXiv1412.2352OpenAlexW2081305792MaRDI QIDQ2342551
István Vajk, Sándor Kolumbán, Johan Schoukens
Publication date: 28 April 2015
Published in: Automatica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2352
Related Items (5)
Asymptotic properties of SPS confidence regions ⋮ Non-asymptotic state-space identification of closed-loop stochastic linear systems using instrumental variables ⋮ Facing undermodelling in sign-perturbed-sums system identification ⋮ Covariance analysis in SISO linear systems identification ⋮ A simple condition for the boundedness of sign-perturbed-sums (SPS) confidence regions
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Assessing the quality of identified models through the asymptotic theory -- when is the result reliable?
- Parameter identification for nonlinear systems: guaranteed confidence regions through LSCR
- Guaranteed non-asymptotic confidence regions in system identification
- Guaranteed characterization of exact non-asymptotic confidence regions as defined by LSCR and SPS
- Non-Asymptotic Confidence Sets for the Parameters of Linear Transfer Functions
This page was built for publication: Perturbed datasets methods for hypothesis testing and structure of corresponding confidence sets