Almost all social choice rules are highly manipulable, but a few aren't

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 18:52, 2 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:2365784


DOI10.1007/BF00183344zbMath0779.90006MaRDI QIDQ2365784

Jerry S. Kelly

Publication date: 29 June 1993

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00183344


91B14: Social choice


Related Items

Incentives in matching markets: Counting and comparing manipulating agents, The difference between manipulability indices in the IC and IANC models, A quantitative Gobbard-Satterthwaite theorem without neutrality, Are Condorcet procedures so bad according to the reinforcement axiom?, Voting with rubber bands, weights, and strings, On the manipulability of voting rules: the case of \(4\) and \(5\) alternatives, The geometry of manipulation -- a quantitative proof of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem, Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules, Almost-dominant strategy implementation: exchange economies, On the average minimum size of a manipulating coalition, Anonymous voting and minimal manipulability, Minimally manipulable anonymous social choice functions, Asymptotics of the minimum manipulating coalition size for positional voting rules under impartial culture behaviour, Defending against strategic manipulation in uninorm-based multi-agent decision making, The reinforcement axiom under sequential positional rules, Incentive compatibility and strategy-proofness of mechanisms of organizational behavior control: retrospective, state of the art, and prospects of theoretical research, Manipulation of social choice functions under incomplete information, Characterising scoring rules by their solution in iteratively undominated strategies, A correspondence between voting procedures and stochastic orderings, Manipulable outcomes within the class of scoring voting rules, Strategic voting and nomination, Dictatorship versus manipulability, Exact results on manipulability of positional voting rules, Gains from manipulating social choice rules, Some further results on the manipulability of social choice rules, Monotonicity properties and their adaptation to irresolute social choice rules, Minimal manipulability: unanimity and nondictatorship