Stability of \(C^*\)-algebras is not a stable property (Q1383290)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 09:55, 20 July 2023 by Importer (talk | contribs) (‎Created a new Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Stability of \(C^*\)-algebras is not a stable property
scientific article

    Statements

    Stability of \(C^*\)-algebras is not a stable property (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    14 April 1998
    0 references
    Summary: We show that there exists a \(C^*\)-algebra \(B\) such that \(M_2(B)\) is stable, but \(B\) is not stable. Hence stability of \(C^*\)-algebras is not a stable property. More generally, we find for each integer \(n\geq 2\) a \(C^*\)-algebra \(B\) so that \(M_n(B)\) is stable and \(M_k(B)\) is not stable when \(1< k< n\). The \(C^*\)-algebras we exhibit have the additional properties that they are simple, nuclear and of stable rank one. The construction is similar to \textit{J. Villadsen's} construction in [``Simple \(C^*\)-algebras with perforation'', to appear in J. Funct. Anal.] of a simple \(C^*\)-algebra with perforation in its ordered \(K_0\)-group.
    0 references
    stable \(C^*\)-algebras
    0 references
    perforation in \(K_0\)
    0 references
    scaled ordered Abelian groups
    0 references
    stability of \(C^*\)-algebras is not a stable property
    0 references
    simple
    0 references
    nuclear
    0 references
    stable rank
    0 references
    simple \(C^*\)-algebra
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references