INLA or MCMC? A tutorial and comparative evaluation for spatial prediction in log-Gaussian Cox processes
Publication:5219491
DOI10.1080/00949655.2013.788653zbMath1453.62214arXiv1202.1738OpenAlexW2162487434WikidataQ58851770 ScholiaQ58851770MaRDI QIDQ5219491
Benjamin M. Taylor, Peter J. Diggle
Publication date: 12 March 2020
Published in: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.1738
Markov chain Monte Carlospatial modellingintegrated nested Laplace approximationlog-Gaussian Cox process
Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics (62-08) Random fields; image analysis (62M40)
Related Items (17)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- An Explicit Link between Gaussian Fields and Gaussian Markov Random Fields: The Stochastic Partial Differential Equation Approach
- Exponential convergence of Langevin distributions and their discrete approximations
- Optimal scaling for various Metropolis-Hastings algorithms.
- Spatiotemporal Prediction for Log-Gaussian Cox Processes
- Going off grid: computationally efficient inference for log-Gaussian Cox processes
- Approximate Bayesian Inference for Latent Gaussian models by using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations
- Fixed-Width Output Analysis for Markov Chain Monte Carlo
- Handbook of Spatial Statistics
- Optimal Scaling of Discrete Approximations to Langevin Diffusions
- Log Gaussian Cox Processes
- Fitting Gaussian Markov Random Fields to Gaussian Fields
- Riemann Manifold Langevin and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Methods
- Gaussian Markov Random Fields
- Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
- Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications
- A Stochastic Approximation Method
This page was built for publication: INLA or MCMC? A tutorial and comparative evaluation for spatial prediction in log-Gaussian Cox processes