Woodin’s axiom (*), or Martin’s Maximum, or both?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5351855
DOI10.1090/conm/690/13868zbMath1423.03198OpenAlexW4235472892MaRDI QIDQ5351855
Publication date: 30 August 2017
Published in: Foundations of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/690/13868
Inner models, including constructibility, ordinal definability, and core models (03E45) Large cardinals (03E55) Other set-theoretic hypotheses and axioms (03E65) Determinacy principles (03E60) Generic absoluteness and forcing axioms (03E57)
Related Items (2)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Bounded Martin's maximum with an asterisk
- Martin's maximum and definability in \(H(\aleph_2\))
- \(\Pi_2\) consequences of \(\mathsf{BMM}+\mathsf{NS}_{\omega_1}\) is precipitous and the semiproperness of stationary set preserving forcings
- Martin's maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. I
- The axiom of determinacy, forcing axioms, and the nonstationary ideal
- Martin's Maximum and the \(\mathbb{P}_{\max}\) Axiom \((*)\)
- The envelope of a pointclass under a local determinacy hypothesis
- Set theory. Exploring independence and truth
- Woodin's axiom (*), bounded forcing axioms, and precipitous ideals on ω1
- Hod mice and the Mouse Set Conjecture
- An Outline of Inner Model Theory
- Large Cardinals from Determinacy
- Forcing over Models of Determinacy
- Two Consequences of Determinacy Consistent with Choice
- The self-iterability of L[E]
- Increasing u2 by a stationary set preserving forcing
- A Proof of Projective Determinacy
- Iteration Trees
- A theorem of Woodin on mouse sets
This page was built for publication: Woodin’s axiom (*), or Martin’s Maximum, or both?