A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy”

DOI10.1002/bimj.201700001zbMath1391.62254OpenAlexW2616408024WikidataQ30234457 ScholiaQ30234457MaRDI QIDQ5364013

Stefan Wellek

Publication date: 2 October 2017

Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201700001

zbMATH Keywords

predictiondata miningBayesian inferencehypotheses testingmeasures of evidencemultiplicity correctionreproducibility crisis\(p\)-value controversyreproducibility of experiments

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)

Related Items (8)

The role of the p-value in the multitesting problem ⋮ Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Defended and Calibrated by Bayesian Model Checking ⋮ Theoretical and empirical distributions of the \(p\) value ⋮ Fisher's disjunction as the principle vindicating \(p\)-values, confidence intervals, and their generalizations: a frequentist semantics for possibility theory ⋮ Fiducialize statistical significance: transformingp-values into conservative posterior probabilities and Bayes factors ⋮ A note on tests for relevant differences with extremely large sample sizes ⋮ Some robust approaches based on copula for monitoring bivariate processes and component-wise assessment ⋮ Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”

This page was built for publication: A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy”