Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Defended and Calibrated by Bayesian Model Checking

DOI10.1080/00031305.2019.1699443MaRDI QIDQ5056972zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors David R. Bickel

Publication date 14 December 2022

Published in The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1699443

zbMATH Keywords

hypothesis testingmodel checkingobjective Bayes factorrelative belief ratio\(p\)-value calibrationreproducibility crisis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3441432 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2199136 (Why is no real title available?)
• A STATISTICAL PARADOX
• A comment on D. V. Lindley's statistical paradox
• A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy”
• A general framework for model-based statistics
• Almost sure hypothesis testing and a resolution of the Jeffreys-Lindley paradox
• Calibration of \(\rho \) values for testing precise null hypotheses
• Confidence distributions and empirical Bayes posterior distributions unified as distributions of evidential support
• Correcting false discovery rates for their bias toward false positives
• Decision making under uncertainty using imprecise probabilities
• Error probabilities in default Bayesian hypothesis testing
• Inference after checking multiple Bayesian models for data conflict and applications to mitigating the influence of rejected priors
• Large-scale inference. Empirical Bayes methods for estimation, testing, and prediction
• Measuring statistical evidence using relative belief
• Post-Processing Posterior PredictivepValues
• Prior and posterior predictive p-values in the one-sided location parameter testing problem
• Reporting Bayes factors or probabilities to decision makers of unknown loss functions
• Revised standards for statistical evidence
• The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
• The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-Values
• The one-sided posterior predictive \(p\)-value for Fieller's problem

Cited in

(6)

• Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Interpreted and Calibrated by Estimating Probabilities of Sign Errors: A Bayes-Frequentist Continuum
• Maximum entropy derived and generalized under idempotent probability to address Bayes-frequentist uncertainty and model revision uncertainty: an information-theoretic semantics for possibility theory
• Publication Policies for Replicable Research and the Community-Wide False Discovery Rate
• Statistical evidence and surprise unified under possibility theory
• The \(p\)-value interpreted as the posterior probability of explaining the data: applications to multiple testing and to restricted parameter spaces
• Fiducialize statistical significance: transformingp-values into conservative posterior probabilities and Bayes factors

This page was built for publication: Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Defended and Calibrated by Bayesian Model Checking

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5056972)