The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-Values
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5868252
DOI10.1080/00031305.2018.1529622OpenAlexW3103877208WikidataQ64117293 ScholiaQ64117293MaRDI QIDQ5868252
Publication date: 20 September 2022
Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04888
Bayeslikelihood ratiopositive predictive valuefalse positiveFPRfalse positive report probabilityfalse positive riskpoint null
Related Items (8)
Publication Policies for Replicable Research and the Community-Wide False Discovery Rate ⋮ Comparative Probability Metrics: Using Posterior Probabilities to Account for Practical Equivalence in A/B tests ⋮ Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Interpreted and Calibrated by Estimating Probabilities of Sign Errors: A Bayes-Frequentist Continuum ⋮ Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Defended and Calibrated by Bayesian Model Checking ⋮ History and nature of the Jeffreys-Lindley paradox ⋮ Fiducialize statistical significance: transformingp-values into conservative posterior probabilities and Bayes factors ⋮ Reproducibility of biomarker identifications from mass spectrometry proteomic data in cancer studies ⋮ Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Uniformly most powerful Bayesian tests
- Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
- Revised standards for statistical evidence
- A STATISTICAL PARADOX
- A comment on D. V. Lindley's statistical paradox
- Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
- THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEAN
- Calibration ofρValues for Testing Precise Null Hypotheses
- The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- Why should clinicians care about Bayesian methods? (With discussions and response)
This page was built for publication: The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-Values
